2018•Cambridge University Press eBooksOpen access

Hunter-Gatherer Persistence and Demography in Patagonia (Southern South America): The Impact of Ecological Changes during the Pleistocene and Holocene

Valeria Bernal, S. Iván Pérez, María Bárbara Postillone, Diego Rindel

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

The results of this chapter suggest that hunter-gatherers from northwest and south Patagonia were resilient to the significant ecological changes that took place during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. In particular, the rate of population growth was resistant to reduction in the diversity of available resources as a consequence of megafaunal extinctions around 10 000 BP. The resistance of hunter-gatherers from northwest and south Patagonia could be related to the ability of human populations to absorb the impact of relatively slow ecological changes. The chronological association between the demographic dynamics and archaeological evidence suggests that cultural responses (i.e., technological changes) might have helped maintain and even increase human population density. Thus, the two populations used ecological adaptations as a way to maintain, and even grow, effective population sizes during a period of ecological turnover.Despite evidence for population growth during the Pleistocene?Holocene transition, the human populations living in these two regions responded in different ways to megafaunal extinctions. Populations in south Patagonia persisted through a low but constant rate of population growth that mirrored the demographic expansion of highly valued prey. The northwestern population experienced a faster rate of growth, probably sustained by an increase in the carrying capacity of the environment mediated by cultural changes that expanded dietary breadth. These results demonstrate that demographic resilience is mediated by differing modes of cultural adaptation to environmental challenges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The results of this chapter suggest that hunter-gatherers from northwest and south Patagonia were resilient to the significant ecological changes that took place during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. In particular, the rate of population growth was resistant to reduction in the diversity of available resources as a consequence of megafaunal extinctions around 10 000 BP. The resistance of hunter-gatherers from northwest and south Patagonia could be related to the ability of human populations to absorb the impact of relatively slow ecological changes. The chronological association between the demographic dynamics and archaeological evidence suggests that cultural responses (i.e., technological changes) might have helped maintain and even increase human population density. Thus, the two populations used ecological adaptations as a way to maintain, and even grow, effective population sizes during a period of ecological turnover.Despite evidence for population growth during the Pleistocene?Holocene transition, the human populations living in these two regions responded in different ways to megafaunal extinctions. Populations in south Patagonia persisted through a low but constant rate of population growth that mirrored the demographic expansion of highly valued prey. The northwestern population experienced a faster rate of growth, probably sustained by an increase in the carrying capacity of the environment mediated by cultural changes that expanded dietary breadth. These results demonstrate that demographic resilience is mediated by differing modes of cultural adaptation to environmental challenges.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The results of this chapter suggest that hunter-gatherers from northwest and south Patagonia were resilient to the significant ecological changes that took place during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. In particular, the rate of population growth was resistant to reduction in the diversity of available resources as a consequence of megafaunal extinctions around 10 000 BP. The resistance of hunter-gatherers from northwest and south Patagonia could be related to the ability of human populations to absorb the impact of relatively slow ecological changes. The chronological association between the demographic dynamics and archaeological evidence suggests that cultural responses (i.e., technological changes) might have helped maintain and even increase human population density. Thus, the two populations used ecological adaptations as a way to maintain, and even grow, effective population sizes during a period of ecological turnover.Despite evidence for population growth during the Pleistocene?Holocene transition, the human populations living in these two regions responded in different ways to megafaunal extinctions. Populations in south Patagonia persisted through a low but constant rate of population growth that mirrored the demographic expansion of highly valued prey. The northwestern population experienced a faster rate of growth, probably sustained by an increase in the carrying capacity of the environment mediated by cultural changes that expanded dietary breadth. These results demonstrate that demographic resilience is mediated by differing modes of cultural adaptation to environmental challenges.

Key concepts: Hunter-gatherer, Holocene, Persistence (discontinuity), Pleistocene, Geography, Ecology, Archaeology, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hunter-Gatherer Persistence and Demography in Patagonia (Southern South America): The Impact of Ecological Changes during the Pleistocene and Holocene — Research Paper | ScholarLens