2020•Applied SciencesOpen access

Smoothing and Differentiation of Kinematic Data Using Functional Data Analysis Approach: An Application of Automatic and Subjective Methods

Muhammad Athif Mat Zin, Azmin Sham Rambely, Noratiqah Mohd Ariff, Muhammad Shahimi Ariffin

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

Smoothing is one of the fundamental procedures in functional data analysis (FDA). The smoothing parameter λ influences data smoothness and fitting, which is governed by selecting automatic methods, namely, cross-validation (CV) and generalized cross-validation (GCV) or subjective assessment. However, previous biomechanics research has only applied subjective assessment in choosing optimal λ without using any automatic methods beforehand. None of that research demonstrated how the subjective assessment was made. Thus, the goal of this research was to apply the FDA method to smoothing and differentiating kinematic data, specifically right hip flexion/extension (F/E) angle during the American kettlebell swing (AKS) and determine the optimal λ . CV and GCV were applied prior to the subjective assessment with various values of λ together with cubic and quintic spline (B-spline) bases using the FDA approach. The selection of optimal λ was based on smoothed and well-fitted first and second derivatives. The chosen optimal λ was 1 × 10 − 12 with a quintic spline (B-spline) basis and penalized fourth-order derivative. Quintic spline is a better smoothing and differentiation method compared to cubic spline, as it does not produce zero acceleration at endpoints. CV and GCV did not give optimal λ , forcing subjective assessment to be employed instead.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Smoothing is one of the fundamental procedures in functional data analysis (FDA). The smoothing parameter λ influences data smoothness and fitting, which is governed by selecting automatic methods, namely, cross-validation (CV) and generalized cross-validation (GCV) or subjective assessment. However, previous biomechanics research has only applied subjective assessment in choosing optimal λ without using any automatic methods beforehand. None of that research demonstrated how the subjective assessment was made. Thus, the goal of this research was to apply the FDA method to smoothing and differentiating kinematic data, specifically right hip flexion/extension (F/E) angle during the American kettlebell swing (AKS) and determine the optimal λ . CV and GCV were applied prior to the subjective assessment with various values of λ together with cubic and quintic spline (B-spline) bases using the FDA approach. The selection of optimal λ was based on smoothed and well-fitted first and second derivatives. The chosen optimal λ was 1 × 10 − 12 with a quintic spline (B-spline) basis and penalized fourth-order derivative. Quintic spline is a better smoothing and differentiation method compared to cubic spline, as it does not produce zero acceleration at endpoints. CV and GCV did not give optimal λ , forcing subjective assessment to be employed instead.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Smoothing is one of the fundamental procedures in functional data analysis (FDA). The smoothing parameter λ influences data smoothness and fitting, which is governed by selecting automatic methods, namely, cross-validation (CV) and generalized cross-validation (GCV) or subjective assessment. However, previous biomechanics research has only applied subjective assessment in choosing optimal λ without using any automatic methods beforehand. None of that research demonstrated how the subjective assessment was made. Thus, the goal of this research was to apply the FDA method to smoothing and differentiating kinematic data, specifically right hip flexion/extension (F/E) angle during the American kettlebell swing (AKS) and determine the optimal λ . CV and GCV were applied prior to the subjective assessment with various values of λ together with cubic and quintic spline (B-spline) bases using the FDA approach. The selection of optimal λ was based on smoothed and well-fitted first and second derivatives. The chosen optimal λ was 1 × 10 − 12 with a quintic spline (B-spline) basis and penalized fourth-order derivative. Quintic spline is a better smoothing and differentiation method compared to cubic spline, as it does not produce zero acceleration at endpoints. CV and GCV did not give optimal λ , forcing subjective assessment to be employed instead.

Key concepts: Smoothing spline, Smoothing, Thin plate spline, Kinematics, Functional data analysis, Spline (mechanical), Smoothness, Quintic function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Smoothing and Differentiation of Kinematic Data Using Functional Data Analysis Approach: An Application of Automatic and Subjective Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens