2020bepress Legal RepositoryRequires access

So Much to Comment on, So Little Time: Notice-and-Comment Requirements in Agency Informal Rulemaking Under the Administrative Procedure Act

Kadie Martin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

On February 1, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided National Lifeline Ass’n v. FCC. In National Lifeline Ass’n, the D.C. Circuit Court held that, by adopting changes to a tribal telecommunications subsidy that contradicted prior policy rationale after only a two-week comment period, the agency both: (1) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, and (2) violated procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). National Lifeline Ass’n represented a matter of first impression among the federal circuit courts and established a minimum comment period of thirty days for informal agency rulemaking. This Comment argues that the D.C. Circuit Court’s substantive holding aligned with prior case law, but that the procedural holding was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council and the spirit of the APA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On February 1, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided National Lifeline Ass’n v. FCC. In National Lifeline Ass’n, the D.C. Circuit Court held that, by adopting changes to a tribal telecommunications subsidy that contradicted prior policy rationale after only a two-week comment period, the agency both: (1) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, and (2) violated procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). National Lifeline Ass’n represented a matter of first impression among the federal circuit courts and established a minimum comment period of thirty days for informal agency rulemaking. This Comment argues that the D.C. Circuit Court’s substantive holding aligned with prior case law, but that the procedural holding was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council and the spirit of the APA.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On February 1, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided National Lifeline Ass’n v. FCC. In National Lifeline Ass’n, the D.C. Circuit Court held that, by adopting changes to a tribal telecommunications subsidy that contradicted prior policy rationale after only a two-week comment period, the agency both: (1) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, and (2) violated procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). National Lifeline Ass’n represented a matter of first impression among the federal circuit courts and established a minimum comment period of thirty days for informal agency rulemaking. This Comment argues that the D.C. Circuit Court’s substantive holding aligned with prior case law, but that the procedural holding was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council and the spirit of the APA.

Key concepts: Rulemaking, Notice, Agency (philosophy), Business, Law and economics, Law, Political science, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
So Much to Comment on, So Little Time: Notice-and-Comment Requirements in Agency Informal Rulemaking Under the Administrative Procedure Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens