2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Challenges of Partisan Conflict for Lawmaking in Congress

Laurel Harbridge‐Yong

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Increasing party polarization and decreasing bipartisanship over the last several decades have made many skeptical of Congress’s ability to address national concerns via the traditional legislative process. This frustration includes both a worry that Congress faces gridlock and fails to address problems, as well as concerns that when Congress does act, legislation is pushed through on party-line votes, with little deliberation for room for bipartisan compromises. This chapter explores whether Congress is currently capable of creating meaningful legislation both in terms of the risks of gridlock and whether the legislation that does pass is substantially more partisan than in previous eras. What factors prevent quality lawmaking and when is lawmaking still possible?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Increasing party polarization and decreasing bipartisanship over the last several decades have made many skeptical of Congress’s ability to address national concerns via the traditional legislative process. This frustration includes both a worry that Congress faces gridlock and fails to address problems, as well as concerns that when Congress does act, legislation is pushed through on party-line votes, with little deliberation for room for bipartisan compromises. This chapter explores whether Congress is currently capable of creating meaningful legislation both in terms of the risks of gridlock and whether the legislation that does pass is substantially more partisan than in previous eras. What factors prevent quality lawmaking and when is lawmaking still possible?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Increasing party polarization and decreasing bipartisanship over the last several decades have made many skeptical of Congress’s ability to address national concerns via the traditional legislative process. This frustration includes both a worry that Congress faces gridlock and fails to address problems, as well as concerns that when Congress does act, legislation is pushed through on party-line votes, with little deliberation for room for bipartisan compromises. This chapter explores whether Congress is currently capable of creating meaningful legislation both in terms of the risks of gridlock and whether the legislation that does pass is substantially more partisan than in previous eras. What factors prevent quality lawmaking and when is lawmaking still possible?

Key concepts: Lawmaking, Political science, Law and economics, Political economy, Law, Sociology, Legislature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Challenges of Partisan Conflict for Lawmaking in Congress — Research Paper | ScholarLens