2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

Pollution and Environmental Protection

Douglas J. Den Uyl

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The Upjohn resolution demands a specific course of action to correct the problem, while the Occidental resolution calls for an environmental impact report. The charges against Occidental are, however, more serious than those against Upjohn, since there is some ambiguity about the exact nature of the safety hazard involved in the Upjohn case. The moral problem associated with pollution can be stated simply enough: one person cannot dump his garbage on another person’s property without the latter’s permission. The solution to this problem is either to get permission or to find some other way to harmlessly process one’s waste. There is, of course, a third alternative—one that seems to be at the core of the positions of many extremist environmental groups. The third position is that producing garbage is wrong, and thus the problem can be solved by stopping the production of garbage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Upjohn resolution demands a specific course of action to correct the problem, while the Occidental resolution calls for an environmental impact report. The charges against Occidental are, however, more serious than those against Upjohn, since there is some ambiguity about the exact nature of the safety hazard involved in the Upjohn case. The moral problem associated with pollution can be stated simply enough: one person cannot dump his garbage on another person’s property without the latter’s permission. The solution to this problem is either to get permission or to find some other way to harmlessly process one’s waste. There is, of course, a third alternative—one that seems to be at the core of the positions of many extremist environmental groups. The third position is that producing garbage is wrong, and thus the problem can be solved by stopping the production of garbage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Upjohn resolution demands a specific course of action to correct the problem, while the Occidental resolution calls for an environmental impact report. The charges against Occidental are, however, more serious than those against Upjohn, since there is some ambiguity about the exact nature of the safety hazard involved in the Upjohn case. The moral problem associated with pollution can be stated simply enough: one person cannot dump his garbage on another person’s property without the latter’s permission. The solution to this problem is either to get permission or to find some other way to harmlessly process one’s waste. There is, of course, a third alternative—one that seems to be at the core of the positions of many extremist environmental groups. The third position is that producing garbage is wrong, and thus the problem can be solved by stopping the production of garbage.

Key concepts: Pollution, Environmental pollution, Environmental protection, Environmental science, Environmental planning, Ecology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pollution and Environmental Protection — Research Paper | ScholarLens