2020Unpublished venueRequires access

The EU between technocratic and democratic legitimacy

Marina Costa Lobo, Ian P. McManus

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Technocracy is a multidimensional concept which encompasses different types. This chapter focuses on citizens of Eurozone countries and their preferences for “systemic” technocracy and discusses the meaning of technocracy and how it has evolved in the European context. It presents a number of hypotheses about citizens’ views on technocracy in the Eurozone and among those countries where bailout programmes were implemented or that had technocratic governments within the Eurozone. The belief that the European Union (EU) or the International Monetary Fund are the best crisis managers serves as a proxy for support for the troika, and support for technocratic governance more broadly. The experience of having a technocratic government was associated with an increase in the odds of supporting technocracy in Greece and Italy. The impact which the rise in technocratic decision making has had for democratic legitimacy has been extensively discussed at the EU level.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Technocracy is a multidimensional concept which encompasses different types. This chapter focuses on citizens of Eurozone countries and their preferences for “systemic” technocracy and discusses the meaning of technocracy and how it has evolved in the European context. It presents a number of hypotheses about citizens’ views on technocracy in the Eurozone and among those countries where bailout programmes were implemented or that had technocratic governments within the Eurozone. The belief that the European Union (EU) or the International Monetary Fund are the best crisis managers serves as a proxy for support for the troika, and support for technocratic governance more broadly. The experience of having a technocratic government was associated with an increase in the odds of supporting technocracy in Greece and Italy. The impact which the rise in technocratic decision making has had for democratic legitimacy has been extensively discussed at the EU level.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Technocracy is a multidimensional concept which encompasses different types. This chapter focuses on citizens of Eurozone countries and their preferences for “systemic” technocracy and discusses the meaning of technocracy and how it has evolved in the European context. It presents a number of hypotheses about citizens’ views on technocracy in the Eurozone and among those countries where bailout programmes were implemented or that had technocratic governments within the Eurozone. The belief that the European Union (EU) or the International Monetary Fund are the best crisis managers serves as a proxy for support for the troika, and support for technocratic governance more broadly. The experience of having a technocratic government was associated with an increase in the odds of supporting technocracy in Greece and Italy. The impact which the rise in technocratic decision making has had for democratic legitimacy has been extensively discussed at the EU level.

Key concepts: Technocracy, Democratic legitimacy, Legitimacy, Democracy, Political science, Political economy, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The EU between technocratic and democratic legitimacy — Research Paper | ScholarLens