Surface pressure modification driven by a dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator: Performance dependence on airfoil shape
Rena Goyagi, Atsushi Komuro, Rio Kawate, Wakana Sato, Kento Suzuki, Akira Ando
Abstract
Open-access reader
Rena Goyagi, Atsushi Komuro, Rio Kawate, Wakana Sato, Kento Suzuki, Akira Ando
Abstract
Open-access reader
Optimization of the airfoil shape and flow-control device is critical for optimal performance of fluid devices, such as wind turbines and aircraft. In this study, the combined effects of an airfoil and a dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator (DBD-PA), utilized as the flow-control device, were evaluated through surface pressure measurements in a wind-tunnel experiment using three types of airfoils: Göttingen 387, SG6043, and the NASA Common Research Model (NASA-CRM). Our experimental results demonstrated that combining the DBD-PA with either the SG6043 or NASA-CRM foil improved the maximum lift of the airfoil; the DBD-PA with the Göttingen 387 foil maintained lift even after the stall angle. These results indicate that the flow-control performance of a DBD-PA varies not only with the Reynolds number but also with the shape of the airfoil.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Optimization of the airfoil shape and flow-control device is critical for optimal performance of fluid devices, such as wind turbines and aircraft. In this study, the combined effects of an airfoil and a dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator (DBD-PA), utilized as the flow-control device, were evaluated through surface pressure measurements in a wind-tunnel experiment using three types of airfoils: Göttingen 387, SG6043, and the NASA Common Research Model (NASA-CRM). Our experimental results demonstrated that combining the DBD-PA with either the SG6043 or NASA-CRM foil improved the maximum lift of the airfoil; the DBD-PA with the Göttingen 387 foil maintained lift even after the stall angle. These results indicate that the flow-control performance of a DBD-PA varies not only with the Reynolds number but also with the shape of the airfoil.
Key concepts: Airfoil, Plasma actuator, Dielectric barrier discharge, Stall (fluid mechanics), Wind tunnel, Materials science, Angle of attack, Flow control (data)