2020•Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)Open access

Two-worker competition in gift-exchange: assessing intention-based reciprocity and inequity aversion

Francesco Bogliacino, Nicolás Rodríguez González

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In this article, we study a three-person gift exchange, where two workers compete for a bonus. We derive the equilibrium properties of the models of sequential reciprocity and inequity aversion. We then prove a comparative statics theorem, when one worker becomes \nmore productive. We show that compared with the predictions of outcome based model, those of the intention based model contrast sharply. This creates an ideal setting in which to perform a controlled experiment to test them. Our results largely support sequential reciprocity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, we study a three-person gift exchange, where two workers compete for a bonus. We derive the equilibrium properties of the models of sequential reciprocity and inequity aversion. We then prove a comparative statics theorem, when one worker becomes \nmore productive. We show that compared with the predictions of outcome based model, those of the intention based model contrast sharply. This creates an ideal setting in which to perform a controlled experiment to test them. Our results largely support sequential reciprocity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, we study a three-person gift exchange, where two workers compete for a bonus. We derive the equilibrium properties of the models of sequential reciprocity and inequity aversion. We then prove a comparative statics theorem, when one worker becomes \nmore productive. We show that compared with the predictions of outcome based model, those of the intention based model contrast sharply. This creates an ideal setting in which to perform a controlled experiment to test them. Our results largely support sequential reciprocity.

Key concepts: Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), Inequity aversion, Comparative statics, Economics, Outcome (game theory), Microeconomics, Contrast (vision), Competition (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two-worker competition in gift-exchange: assessing intention-based reciprocity and inequity aversion — Research Paper | ScholarLens