Possible Limitations to the Role of Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice – Viewed from Some State Practices
Yukiya Hamamoto
Abstract
Yukiya Hamamoto
Abstract
Abstract The International Law Commission completed its work on subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties. While acknowledging the importance of the work, this article attempts to highlight some issues that may limit treaty interpretation through subsequent agreements and subsequent practice. Concrete examples of treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and a treaty ending a war are used to illustrate such potential limitations.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The International Law Commission completed its work on subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties. While acknowledging the importance of the work, this article attempts to highlight some issues that may limit treaty interpretation through subsequent agreements and subsequent practice. Concrete examples of treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and a treaty ending a war are used to illustrate such potential limitations.
Key concepts: Treaty, Interpretation (philosophy), Public international law, Commission, International law, Law, Political science, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties