Association between Detailed Disclosure on External Audit Execution and Audit Quality
허진숙, 기은선
Abstract
허진숙, 기은선
Abstract
New International Standards on Auditing adopts a top-down risk based approach. It emphasizes an appropriate audit planning and the involvement of key engagement team members in the planning phase. We examine how additional audit efforts to the planning are related to audit quality. In addition, we investigate whether the relation between abnormal audit planning ratio and audit quality varies with the extent of the involvement of engagement partner. We use a total of 1,479 listed companies with detailed disclosure on audit hour by audit team members in 2014. We employ discretionary accruals as a proxy for audit quality. Abnormal audit planning ratio is measured as the difference between actual audit planning ratio and expected audit planning ratio. We find that abnormal audit planning ratio is negatively related to discretionary accruals. It implies that the sufficient time commitment to the audit planning can enhance audit quality. However, the proportion of partner time (as a fraction of total audit hours) does not affect this relation significantly. These findings add to our understanding of how the assignment of audit resources can affect audit quality.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
New International Standards on Auditing adopts a top-down risk based approach. It emphasizes an appropriate audit planning and the involvement of key engagement team members in the planning phase. We examine how additional audit efforts to the planning are related to audit quality. In addition, we investigate whether the relation between abnormal audit planning ratio and audit quality varies with the extent of the involvement of engagement partner. We use a total of 1,479 listed companies with detailed disclosure on audit hour by audit team members in 2014. We employ discretionary accruals as a proxy for audit quality. Abnormal audit planning ratio is measured as the difference between actual audit planning ratio and expected audit planning ratio. We find that abnormal audit planning ratio is negatively related to discretionary accruals. It implies that the sufficient time commitment to the audit planning can enhance audit quality. However, the proportion of partner time (as a fraction of total audit hours) does not affect this relation significantly. These findings add to our understanding of how the assignment of audit resources can affect audit quality.
Key concepts: Audit, Audit plan, Business, Quality audit, Accounting, Audit evidence, Accrual, Joint audit