2020International journal of entrepreneurshipRequires access

Study of Capital Structures and Corporate Social Responsibility of New York Stock Exchange Listed Companies: The Case of Brazil and China

Medeiros Ricardo, Santos Josete Florencio

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This study aims to verify whether the capital structure of Brazilian and Chinese companies that disclose Corporate Social Responsibility report, listed on the NYSE, are aligned with the theories of Pecking Order and Trade-off, from 2008 to 2015. It was made the comparison test of means, factorial ANOVA and multiple regressions data on unbalanced panel. The results show that the capital structure of Brazilian companies is aligned with the trade-off theory, while Chinese companies align with the pecking order theory. There is a difference in the leverage of companies that disclose (or not) the report for Brazilian companies, with a positive impact of CSR on leverage, while among Chinese companies the result was not significant. Finally, the leverage of Brazilian companies that publish CSR report differs from Chinese companies that also disclose that report.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aims to verify whether the capital structure of Brazilian and Chinese companies that disclose Corporate Social Responsibility report, listed on the NYSE, are aligned with the theories of Pecking Order and Trade-off, from 2008 to 2015. It was made the comparison test of means, factorial ANOVA and multiple regressions data on unbalanced panel. The results show that the capital structure of Brazilian companies is aligned with the trade-off theory, while Chinese companies align with the pecking order theory. There is a difference in the leverage of companies that disclose (or not) the report for Brazilian companies, with a positive impact of CSR on leverage, while among Chinese companies the result was not significant. Finally, the leverage of Brazilian companies that publish CSR report differs from Chinese companies that also disclose that report.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aims to verify whether the capital structure of Brazilian and Chinese companies that disclose Corporate Social Responsibility report, listed on the NYSE, are aligned with the theories of Pecking Order and Trade-off, from 2008 to 2015. It was made the comparison test of means, factorial ANOVA and multiple regressions data on unbalanced panel. The results show that the capital structure of Brazilian companies is aligned with the trade-off theory, while Chinese companies align with the pecking order theory. There is a difference in the leverage of companies that disclose (or not) the report for Brazilian companies, with a positive impact of CSR on leverage, while among Chinese companies the result was not significant. Finally, the leverage of Brazilian companies that publish CSR report differs from Chinese companies that also disclose that report.

Key concepts: Pecking order theory, Stock exchange, Leverage (statistics), Business, Pecking order, Capital structure, China, Corporate social responsibility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of Capital Structures and Corporate Social Responsibility of New York Stock Exchange Listed Companies: The Case of Brazil and China — Research Paper | ScholarLens