2020DEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human ScienceOpen access

Cast System, Hinduism and Religious Identity

Elena N. Anikeeva

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper deals with complex problem of Indian cast system/division which had been shaped through the ages and up to now violates the principle of human equality. Socio-caste structure arose and rooted in traditional Hindu ideology of ontological division between dvija/twiceborn and outsiders. Cast division had a strong influence on religious and philosophical identity. This paper takes the profound philosophical system of Shaiva-siddhānta as an example, which got an ambiguous identity: not orthodox Hindu darshana (āstika) and not very heterodox (nāstika), but some kinds of marginal to Hinduism. Many of Shaiva-siddhāntin authors were not Brahmins and belonged to shudras and untouchables—not dvija. Status of Shaiva-siddhānta reflects cast contradictions, and contemporary battle of ideas and ethno-cultural dispositions between northern and southern India, Aryans and Dravidians, nigāma (Vedic tradition) and āgama (para-Vedic).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper deals with complex problem of Indian cast system/division which had been shaped through the ages and up to now violates the principle of human equality. Socio-caste structure arose and rooted in traditional Hindu ideology of ontological division between dvija/twiceborn and outsiders. Cast division had a strong influence on religious and philosophical identity. This paper takes the profound philosophical system of Shaiva-siddhānta as an example, which got an ambiguous identity: not orthodox Hindu darshana (āstika) and not very heterodox (nāstika), but some kinds of marginal to Hinduism. Many of Shaiva-siddhāntin authors were not Brahmins and belonged to shudras and untouchables—not dvija. Status of Shaiva-siddhānta reflects cast contradictions, and contemporary battle of ideas and ethno-cultural dispositions between northern and southern India, Aryans and Dravidians, nigāma (Vedic tradition) and āgama (para-Vedic).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper deals with complex problem of Indian cast system/division which had been shaped through the ages and up to now violates the principle of human equality. Socio-caste structure arose and rooted in traditional Hindu ideology of ontological division between dvija/twiceborn and outsiders. Cast division had a strong influence on religious and philosophical identity. This paper takes the profound philosophical system of Shaiva-siddhānta as an example, which got an ambiguous identity: not orthodox Hindu darshana (āstika) and not very heterodox (nāstika), but some kinds of marginal to Hinduism. Many of Shaiva-siddhāntin authors were not Brahmins and belonged to shudras and untouchables—not dvija. Status of Shaiva-siddhānta reflects cast contradictions, and contemporary battle of ideas and ethno-cultural dispositions between northern and southern India, Aryans and Dravidians, nigāma (Vedic tradition) and āgama (para-Vedic).

Key concepts: Hinduism, Caste, Aryan race, Identity (music), Ideology, Hindutva, Sociology, Religious studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cast System, Hinduism and Religious Identity — Research Paper | ScholarLens