2020Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of SciencesOpen access

Bundelkhand, Aravalli and Dharwar cratons Indian Shield: comparison of Archean crustal evolution and location in the Kenorland Supercontinent structure

Александр Иванович Слабунов, Винод Кумар Сингх, А. И. Слабунов, Vinod K. Singh

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

Comparison of the Meso-Neoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand, Aravalli, Western and Eastern Dharwar Cratons shows that geodynamic mechanisms, similar to modern plate-tectonic and mantle-plume mechanisms, were active in that period. The Mesoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand Craton is considerably different from that of other cratons discussed here in that it comprises subduction-accretion processes, while in other cratons plume processes were more active in this period. In the Neoarchean (2.7-2.5 Ga), all the cratons display subduction-accretion processes. Each of the cratons displays its own crust formation pattern. It seems that in Mesoarchean time the Bundelkhand, Aravalli and Western and Eastern Dharwar Cratons were parts of the Kenorland Supercontinent, rather than one block.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparison of the Meso-Neoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand, Aravalli, Western and Eastern Dharwar Cratons shows that geodynamic mechanisms, similar to modern plate-tectonic and mantle-plume mechanisms, were active in that period. The Mesoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand Craton is considerably different from that of other cratons discussed here in that it comprises subduction-accretion processes, while in other cratons plume processes were more active in this period. In the Neoarchean (2.7-2.5 Ga), all the cratons display subduction-accretion processes. Each of the cratons displays its own crust formation pattern. It seems that in Mesoarchean time the Bundelkhand, Aravalli and Western and Eastern Dharwar Cratons were parts of the Kenorland Supercontinent, rather than one block.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparison of the Meso-Neoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand, Aravalli, Western and Eastern Dharwar Cratons shows that geodynamic mechanisms, similar to modern plate-tectonic and mantle-plume mechanisms, were active in that period. The Mesoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand Craton is considerably different from that of other cratons discussed here in that it comprises subduction-accretion processes, while in other cratons plume processes were more active in this period. In the Neoarchean (2.7-2.5 Ga), all the cratons display subduction-accretion processes. Each of the cratons displays its own crust formation pattern. It seems that in Mesoarchean time the Bundelkhand, Aravalli and Western and Eastern Dharwar Cratons were parts of the Kenorland Supercontinent, rather than one block.

Key concepts: Craton, Dharwar Craton, Supercontinent, Geology, Subduction, Archean, Geochemistry, Earth science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bundelkhand, Aravalli and Dharwar cratons Indian Shield: comparison of Archean crustal evolution and location in the Kenorland Supercontinent structure — Research Paper | ScholarLens