2020arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Comment on "Criticality Between Cortical States"

Alain Destexhe, Jonathan Touboul

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

and collaborators reported extensive analyses of power-law scalings of neuronal avalanches in experimental recordings and in a critical theoretical model. One of their main conclusions is that the brain operates at criticality in specific regimes. To prove this point, they developed a test (hereafter, Fontenele test) for criticality, which they indicate to rely on our own theoretical result. However, the results we established do not provide necessary and sufficient conditions for criticality, and cannot be extrapolated to derive a test for criticality. Moreover, the authors did not include any control applying the test to non-critical systems, to assess possible differences with the experimental data. We propose here two such controls, and show that the test can misclassify as critical these non-critical systems. This implies that the analyses of et al. do not support their conclusions, and the question of whether the brain operates at criticality remains open.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

and collaborators reported extensive analyses of power-law scalings of neuronal avalanches in experimental recordings and in a critical theoretical model. One of their main conclusions is that the brain operates at criticality in specific regimes. To prove this point, they developed a test (hereafter, Fontenele test) for criticality, which they indicate to rely on our own theoretical result. However, the results we established do not provide necessary and sufficient conditions for criticality, and cannot be extrapolated to derive a test for criticality. Moreover, the authors did not include any control applying the test to non-critical systems, to assess possible differences with the experimental data. We propose here two such controls, and show that the test can misclassify as critical these non-critical systems. This implies that the analyses of et al. do not support their conclusions, and the question of whether the brain operates at criticality remains open.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

and collaborators reported extensive analyses of power-law scalings of neuronal avalanches in experimental recordings and in a critical theoretical model. One of their main conclusions is that the brain operates at criticality in specific regimes. To prove this point, they developed a test (hereafter, Fontenele test) for criticality, which they indicate to rely on our own theoretical result. However, the results we established do not provide necessary and sufficient conditions for criticality, and cannot be extrapolated to derive a test for criticality. Moreover, the authors did not include any control applying the test to non-critical systems, to assess possible differences with the experimental data. We propose here two such controls, and show that the test can misclassify as critical these non-critical systems. This implies that the analyses of et al. do not support their conclusions, and the question of whether the brain operates at criticality remains open.

Key concepts: Criticality, Critical point (mathematics), Test (biology), Self-organized criticality, Computer science, Statistical physics, Mathematics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comment on "Criticality Between Cortical States" — Research Paper | ScholarLens