2018Unpublished venueRequires access

English Teaching: Classics in the Vernacular

Michael H. Price

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In her chapter on progressive theorists in relation to English teaching, Margaret Mathieson emphasises their belief that the classical curriculum and traditional teaching methods were personally destructive, remote from pupils&s; experience and needs, and dehumanising. In the 1980s there is little doubt about the prima facie case for English as a main subject on the school curriculum and no one would have any trouble in producing a list of reasons for its inclusion in any description of core subjects. The decades immediately after the First World War were important in the development of English teaching. Mathieson characterises the interwar period by referring to &s; the national sense of inferiority to Europe in education, the rising demand for secondary school places and the general feeling that reform was necessary&s;. The expanding secondary school sector presented a major area of development for English teaching; this was previously a sector where English was neglected but one which provided a route to higher education.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In her chapter on progressive theorists in relation to English teaching, Margaret Mathieson emphasises their belief that the classical curriculum and traditional teaching methods were personally destructive, remote from pupils&s; experience and needs, and dehumanising. In the 1980s there is little doubt about the prima facie case for English as a main subject on the school curriculum and no one would have any trouble in producing a list of reasons for its inclusion in any description of core subjects. The decades immediately after the First World War were important in the development of English teaching. Mathieson characterises the interwar period by referring to &s; the national sense of inferiority to Europe in education, the rising demand for secondary school places and the general feeling that reform was necessary&s;. The expanding secondary school sector presented a major area of development for English teaching; this was previously a sector where English was neglected but one which provided a route to higher education.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In her chapter on progressive theorists in relation to English teaching, Margaret Mathieson emphasises their belief that the classical curriculum and traditional teaching methods were personally destructive, remote from pupils&s; experience and needs, and dehumanising. In the 1980s there is little doubt about the prima facie case for English as a main subject on the school curriculum and no one would have any trouble in producing a list of reasons for its inclusion in any description of core subjects. The decades immediately after the First World War were important in the development of English teaching. Mathieson characterises the interwar period by referring to &s; the national sense of inferiority to Europe in education, the rising demand for secondary school places and the general feeling that reform was necessary&s;. The expanding secondary school sector presented a major area of development for English teaching; this was previously a sector where English was neglected but one which provided a route to higher education.

Key concepts: Vernacular, Classics, Art, Literature, History, Linguistics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
English Teaching: Classics in the Vernacular — Research Paper | ScholarLens