2018La Revue de l IresRequires access

European social dialogue and the ambivalence of the triple A Social Europe

Christophe Degryse

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

After a period in which the European social partners were called on to contribute by means of collective bargaining to the construction of a European social dimension, changes, sometimes unexpected, are now hindering the development of the European social dialogue. The interprofessional level has been weakened by confusion over the objectives and tools of social dialogue: for employers, it is a forum to debate structural reforms of labour markets, for trades unions and in the treaties it is a place for collective bargaining to create social norms that improve living and working conditions. The sectorial level has fallen prey to an unexpected change of attitude by the European Commission itself, which is now impeding a dialogue that could lead to restrictive legal norms in the name – or on the pretext – of regulatory fitness and performance. The ongoing blockage of sectorial social dialogue agreements has a part to play in harming the Juncker Commission’s efforts to achieve its stated objective of a social Triple A rating.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After a period in which the European social partners were called on to contribute by means of collective bargaining to the construction of a European social dimension, changes, sometimes unexpected, are now hindering the development of the European social dialogue. The interprofessional level has been weakened by confusion over the objectives and tools of social dialogue: for employers, it is a forum to debate structural reforms of labour markets, for trades unions and in the treaties it is a place for collective bargaining to create social norms that improve living and working conditions. The sectorial level has fallen prey to an unexpected change of attitude by the European Commission itself, which is now impeding a dialogue that could lead to restrictive legal norms in the name – or on the pretext – of regulatory fitness and performance. The ongoing blockage of sectorial social dialogue agreements has a part to play in harming the Juncker Commission’s efforts to achieve its stated objective of a social Triple A rating.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After a period in which the European social partners were called on to contribute by means of collective bargaining to the construction of a European social dimension, changes, sometimes unexpected, are now hindering the development of the European social dialogue. The interprofessional level has been weakened by confusion over the objectives and tools of social dialogue: for employers, it is a forum to debate structural reforms of labour markets, for trades unions and in the treaties it is a place for collective bargaining to create social norms that improve living and working conditions. The sectorial level has fallen prey to an unexpected change of attitude by the European Commission itself, which is now impeding a dialogue that could lead to restrictive legal norms in the name – or on the pretext – of regulatory fitness and performance. The ongoing blockage of sectorial social dialogue agreements has a part to play in harming the Juncker Commission’s efforts to achieve its stated objective of a social Triple A rating.

Key concepts: Social dialogue, Social partners, Pretext, Ambivalence, European commission, Political science, European union, Collective bargaining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
European social dialogue and the ambivalence of the triple A Social Europe — Research Paper | ScholarLens