2018•Al-Azhar Journal of Dental ScienceRequires access

Rapid arch expansion in cleft lip and palate children: comparison between fan-shaped expander and hyrax-type expander by using cone beam computed tomography

Ahmed M. Sebaey, Samy Y. El-Bayomy, Abo Khalefa Y H Y, I N Abdel-Rahman

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) in children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) treated with 2 expanders. Methods: Twenty Egyptian children with complete unilateral or bilateral CLP exhibiting maxillary transverse deficiency were divided randomly into 2 groups according to the appliance used for expansion: (A) fan expander group and (B) hyrax expander group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before and immediately after expansion procedure. Results: There was non-significant vertical movement of the maxilla for the 2 groups. On the transverse plane, there was more anterior expansion and posterior restriction for the fan group. However, the hyrax group showed significant posterior as well as anterior expansion. Both groups showed significant tipping between both sides posteriorly and anteriorly. Mandibular expansion was non-significant. Conclusion: Fan expander showed better results for children with cleft palate requiring anterior expansion only. Hyrax expander is better used for cases seeking for posterior and anterior expansion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) in children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) treated with 2 expanders. Methods: Twenty Egyptian children with complete unilateral or bilateral CLP exhibiting maxillary transverse deficiency were divided randomly into 2 groups according to the appliance used for expansion: (A) fan expander group and (B) hyrax expander group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before and immediately after expansion procedure. Results: There was non-significant vertical movement of the maxilla for the 2 groups. On the transverse plane, there was more anterior expansion and posterior restriction for the fan group. However, the hyrax group showed significant posterior as well as anterior expansion. Both groups showed significant tipping between both sides posteriorly and anteriorly. Mandibular expansion was non-significant. Conclusion: Fan expander showed better results for children with cleft palate requiring anterior expansion only. Hyrax expander is better used for cases seeking for posterior and anterior expansion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) in children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) treated with 2 expanders. Methods: Twenty Egyptian children with complete unilateral or bilateral CLP exhibiting maxillary transverse deficiency were divided randomly into 2 groups according to the appliance used for expansion: (A) fan expander group and (B) hyrax expander group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before and immediately after expansion procedure. Results: There was non-significant vertical movement of the maxilla for the 2 groups. On the transverse plane, there was more anterior expansion and posterior restriction for the fan group. However, the hyrax group showed significant posterior as well as anterior expansion. Both groups showed significant tipping between both sides posteriorly and anteriorly. Mandibular expansion was non-significant. Conclusion: Fan expander showed better results for children with cleft palate requiring anterior expansion only. Hyrax expander is better used for cases seeking for posterior and anterior expansion.

Key concepts: Hyrax, Maxilla, Cone beam computed tomography, Medicine, Orthodontics, Dentistry, Computed tomography, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rapid arch expansion in cleft lip and palate children: comparison between fan-shaped expander and hyrax-type expander by using cone beam computed tomography — Research Paper | ScholarLens