2019FilomatOpen access

λ-rings, Φ-λ-rings, and Φ-Δ-rings

Rahul Kumar, Atul Gaur

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. The notion of ?-rings, ?-?-rings, and ?-?-rings is introduced which generalize the concept of ?-domains and ?-domains. A ring R is said to be a ?-ring if the set of all overrings of R is linearly ordered under inclusion. A ring R ? H is said to be a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, and a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, where H is the set of all rings such that Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R and ? : T(R) ? RNil(R) is a ring homomorphism defined as ?(x) = x for all x ? T(R). The equivalence of ?-?-rings, ?-?-rings with the latest trending rings in the literature, namely, ?-chained rings and ?-Pr?fer rings is established under some conditions. Using the idealization theory of Nagata, examples are also given to strengthen the concept.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. The notion of ?-rings, ?-?-rings, and ?-?-rings is introduced which generalize the concept of ?-domains and ?-domains. A ring R is said to be a ?-ring if the set of all overrings of R is linearly ordered under inclusion. A ring R ? H is said to be a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, and a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, where H is the set of all rings such that Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R and ? : T(R) ? RNil(R) is a ring homomorphism defined as ?(x) = x for all x ? T(R). The equivalence of ?-?-rings, ?-?-rings with the latest trending rings in the literature, namely, ?-chained rings and ?-Pr?fer rings is established under some conditions. Using the idealization theory of Nagata, examples are also given to strengthen the concept.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. The notion of ?-rings, ?-?-rings, and ?-?-rings is introduced which generalize the concept of ?-domains and ?-domains. A ring R is said to be a ?-ring if the set of all overrings of R is linearly ordered under inclusion. A ring R ? H is said to be a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, and a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, where H is the set of all rings such that Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R and ? : T(R) ? RNil(R) is a ring homomorphism defined as ?(x) = x for all x ? T(R). The equivalence of ?-?-rings, ?-?-rings with the latest trending rings in the literature, namely, ?-chained rings and ?-Pr?fer rings is established under some conditions. Using the idealization theory of Nagata, examples are also given to strengthen the concept.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Principal ideal ring, Noncommutative ring, Reduced ring, Ring (chemistry), Primitive ring, Von Neumann regular ring, Commutative ring

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
λ-rings, Φ-λ-rings, and Φ-Δ-rings — Research Paper | ScholarLens