1998Unpublished venueRequires access

The Total Force Policy: What's Wrong in the Army

Jeffery W. Hammond

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The purpose of paper is to examine relations between the active Army and Army National Guard (ARNG) as members of the Total Army subsequent to the Total Force Policy. Relations between components have long been uneasy dating back to the founding of the nation and opposition to the idea of a large federal standing Army. However, relations have significantly deteriorated since the Gulf War in 1991 and release of the Quadrennial Defense Review in 1997. Efforts to adapt to post Cold War realities have ignited disputes between active Army and ARNG leaders causing one to question roles, missions, and the relevance of Total Army components.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The purpose of paper is to examine relations between the active Army and Army National Guard (ARNG) as members of the Total Army subsequent to the Total Force Policy. Relations between components have long been uneasy dating back to the founding of the nation and opposition to the idea of a large federal standing Army. However, relations have significantly deteriorated since the Gulf War in 1991 and release of the Quadrennial Defense Review in 1997. Efforts to adapt to post Cold War realities have ignited disputes between active Army and ARNG leaders causing one to question roles, missions, and the relevance of Total Army components.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The purpose of paper is to examine relations between the active Army and Army National Guard (ARNG) as members of the Total Army subsequent to the Total Force Policy. Relations between components have long been uneasy dating back to the founding of the nation and opposition to the idea of a large federal standing Army. However, relations have significantly deteriorated since the Gulf War in 1991 and release of the Quadrennial Defense Review in 1997. Efforts to adapt to post Cold War realities have ignited disputes between active Army and ARNG leaders causing one to question roles, missions, and the relevance of Total Army components.

Key concepts: Opposition (politics), Guard (computer science), National guard, Political science, Cold war, Military policy, Law, Civil–military relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Total Force Policy: What's Wrong in the Army — Research Paper | ScholarLens