2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The Problem of Personal Identity

Stefaan E. Cuypers

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this chapter, following a short history of the concept of the person and a more detailed description of the analytical problem of personal identity, the author presents and critically evaluates two prominent analytical theories of personal identity: the empiricist bundle theory and the metaphysical ego theory. He then attempts to demonstrate that the standard debate between empiricists and metaphysicians about personal identity in analytical philosophy culminates in an aporia. The author restricts himself to the standard debate between the adherents of the two most prominent theories. The mental continuity theory of personal identity, according the empiricist, is a special case of the general causal theory of the identity through time of continuants. The nature of empiricist self-identity is related in this respect to the gradual nature of object identity. A close investigation of the empiricist bundle theory leads to the outcome that personal identity is only identity in a loose or conventional sense.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter, following a short history of the concept of the person and a more detailed description of the analytical problem of personal identity, the author presents and critically evaluates two prominent analytical theories of personal identity: the empiricist bundle theory and the metaphysical ego theory. He then attempts to demonstrate that the standard debate between empiricists and metaphysicians about personal identity in analytical philosophy culminates in an aporia. The author restricts himself to the standard debate between the adherents of the two most prominent theories. The mental continuity theory of personal identity, according the empiricist, is a special case of the general causal theory of the identity through time of continuants. The nature of empiricist self-identity is related in this respect to the gradual nature of object identity. A close investigation of the empiricist bundle theory leads to the outcome that personal identity is only identity in a loose or conventional sense.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter, following a short history of the concept of the person and a more detailed description of the analytical problem of personal identity, the author presents and critically evaluates two prominent analytical theories of personal identity: the empiricist bundle theory and the metaphysical ego theory. He then attempts to demonstrate that the standard debate between empiricists and metaphysicians about personal identity in analytical philosophy culminates in an aporia. The author restricts himself to the standard debate between the adherents of the two most prominent theories. The mental continuity theory of personal identity, according the empiricist, is a special case of the general causal theory of the identity through time of continuants. The nature of empiricist self-identity is related in this respect to the gradual nature of object identity. A close investigation of the empiricist bundle theory leads to the outcome that personal identity is only identity in a loose or conventional sense.

Key concepts: Personal identity, Identity (music), Psychology, Art, Social psychology, Aesthetics, Self-concept

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Problem of Personal Identity — Research Paper | ScholarLens