2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Teacher Evaluation and Student Achievement

Arthur K. Ellis, John B. Bond

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

A broadly implemented and equally controversial practice, value-added measures (VAM), as it is called, has resulted in major change in the evaluative practices across the United States. Federal funding was dependent on states including student achievement based on standardized test scores as an element in teacher evaluations. Value-added measures are based on a business model in which decisions are based on data. A huge surge in empirical research has occurred in the last decade regarding the effectiveness of using test scores to evaluate teachers. In Polikoff and Porter analysis of 327 fourth and eighth grade math and English teacher evaluations, the researchers found a weak to non-existent relationship between test scores and teacher effectiveness. Stanford professor Edward Haertel has long been a respected voice regarding educational research. The research has now begun to catch up with implementation, and the findings are mixed at best and often alarming.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A broadly implemented and equally controversial practice, value-added measures (VAM), as it is called, has resulted in major change in the evaluative practices across the United States. Federal funding was dependent on states including student achievement based on standardized test scores as an element in teacher evaluations. Value-added measures are based on a business model in which decisions are based on data. A huge surge in empirical research has occurred in the last decade regarding the effectiveness of using test scores to evaluate teachers. In Polikoff and Porter analysis of 327 fourth and eighth grade math and English teacher evaluations, the researchers found a weak to non-existent relationship between test scores and teacher effectiveness. Stanford professor Edward Haertel has long been a respected voice regarding educational research. The research has now begun to catch up with implementation, and the findings are mixed at best and often alarming.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A broadly implemented and equally controversial practice, value-added measures (VAM), as it is called, has resulted in major change in the evaluative practices across the United States. Federal funding was dependent on states including student achievement based on standardized test scores as an element in teacher evaluations. Value-added measures are based on a business model in which decisions are based on data. A huge surge in empirical research has occurred in the last decade regarding the effectiveness of using test scores to evaluate teachers. In Polikoff and Porter analysis of 327 fourth and eighth grade math and English teacher evaluations, the researchers found a weak to non-existent relationship between test scores and teacher effectiveness. Stanford professor Edward Haertel has long been a respected voice regarding educational research. The research has now begun to catch up with implementation, and the findings are mixed at best and often alarming.

Key concepts: Mathematics education, Student achievement, Psychology, Academic achievement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Teacher Evaluation and Student Achievement — Research Paper | ScholarLens