2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Ethnic politics and competition between right-wing populist parties in Hungary

Edina Szöcsik

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The success of radical right-wing populist parties can only be understood with reference to issues and policies surrounding ethnic minorities. This chapter explores competition in the field of ethnic minority politics between two Hungarian right-wing parties, Jobbik and Fidesz, in the period 2010—2014. It outlines the role of minority groups in the discourses and policies of radical right populist parties and presents an overview of Fidesz and Jobbik and discusses the driving forces behind their electoral successes in the elections of 2010. One of the most pressing questions related to the consequences of the success of radical right populist parties is whether and in which ways they have an impact on the behavior of their mainstream competitors. The discourse of radical right-wing populist parties combines populism, nationalism, and nativism. Hungary is one of the most ethnically homogenous countries in Eastern Europe. Issues of national identity are central to the discourse of radical right populist parties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The success of radical right-wing populist parties can only be understood with reference to issues and policies surrounding ethnic minorities. This chapter explores competition in the field of ethnic minority politics between two Hungarian right-wing parties, Jobbik and Fidesz, in the period 2010—2014. It outlines the role of minority groups in the discourses and policies of radical right populist parties and presents an overview of Fidesz and Jobbik and discusses the driving forces behind their electoral successes in the elections of 2010. One of the most pressing questions related to the consequences of the success of radical right populist parties is whether and in which ways they have an impact on the behavior of their mainstream competitors. The discourse of radical right-wing populist parties combines populism, nationalism, and nativism. Hungary is one of the most ethnically homogenous countries in Eastern Europe. Issues of national identity are central to the discourse of radical right populist parties.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The success of radical right-wing populist parties can only be understood with reference to issues and policies surrounding ethnic minorities. This chapter explores competition in the field of ethnic minority politics between two Hungarian right-wing parties, Jobbik and Fidesz, in the period 2010—2014. It outlines the role of minority groups in the discourses and policies of radical right populist parties and presents an overview of Fidesz and Jobbik and discusses the driving forces behind their electoral successes in the elections of 2010. One of the most pressing questions related to the consequences of the success of radical right populist parties is whether and in which ways they have an impact on the behavior of their mainstream competitors. The discourse of radical right-wing populist parties combines populism, nationalism, and nativism. Hungary is one of the most ethnically homogenous countries in Eastern Europe. Issues of national identity are central to the discourse of radical right populist parties.

Key concepts: Politics, Competition (biology), Right wing, Ethnic group, Political science, Political economy, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ethnic politics and competition between right-wing populist parties in Hungary — Research Paper | ScholarLens