Reinterpretation of Classic Proton Charge Form Factor Measurements
M. Mihovilovič, D. W. Higinbotham, Melisa Bevc, S. Širca
Abstract
Open-access reader
M. Mihovilovič, D. W. Higinbotham, Melisa Bevc, S. Širca
Abstract
Open-access reader
In 1963, a proton radius of 0.805(11) fm was extracted from electron scattering data and this classic value has been used in the standard dipole parameterization of the form factor. In trying to reproduce this classic result, we discovered that there was a sign error in the original analysis and that the authors should have found a value of 0.851(19) fm. We additionally made use of modern computing power to find a robust function for extracting the radius using this 1963 data's spacing and uncertainty. This optimal function, the Pade (0,1) approximant, also gives a result which is consistent with the modern high precision proton radius extractions.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In 1963, a proton radius of 0.805(11) fm was extracted from electron scattering data and this classic value has been used in the standard dipole parameterization of the form factor. In trying to reproduce this classic result, we discovered that there was a sign error in the original analysis and that the authors should have found a value of 0.851(19) fm. We additionally made use of modern computing power to find a robust function for extracting the radius using this 1963 data's spacing and uncertainty. This optimal function, the Pade (0,1) approximant, also gives a result which is consistent with the modern high precision proton radius extractions.
Key concepts: RADIUS, Proton, Charge radius, Sign (mathematics), Reinterpretation, Form factor (electronics), Physics, Dipole