The Success rate of Retrograde Filling Materials in Re-apicectomized Teeth using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Zinc free Amalgam (A comparative clinical study).
Bara Minwah, Wael Hussain, Hani M. Khlaif
Abstract
Open-access reader
Bara Minwah, Wael Hussain, Hani M. Khlaif
Abstract
Open-access reader
Aim of the study: To compare the success rate of root end filling material using MTA( mineral trioxide aggregate) and zinc free amalgam in re-apicectomized teeth. Materials and methods: The study sample consisted of 30 patients having previously failed surgical endodontic treatment. The sample was divided into 2 groups, the 1st group treated with MTA root end filling, while the 2nd group treated with amalgam root end filling. The patients were followed up after 6 months to assess the periapical area both clinically and radiographically. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the success rate of MTA treated group and that of amalgam treated group, although MTA has a higher success rate than amalgam treated group .the success rate of MTA treated group was (86.6 %) while the failure rate of MTA treated group was (13.3%), the success rate of zinc free amalgam treated group was ( 66.6%) and the rate of uncertain healing was (13.3%) while the rate of failure was (22%). Conclusions: MTA can be a good alternative to amalgam as a retro grade filling material, but amalgam is inexpensive, available ,and most of the dentist are familiar with the use of it.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim of the study: To compare the success rate of root end filling material using MTA( mineral trioxide aggregate) and zinc free amalgam in re-apicectomized teeth. Materials and methods: The study sample consisted of 30 patients having previously failed surgical endodontic treatment. The sample was divided into 2 groups, the 1st group treated with MTA root end filling, while the 2nd group treated with amalgam root end filling. The patients were followed up after 6 months to assess the periapical area both clinically and radiographically. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the success rate of MTA treated group and that of amalgam treated group, although MTA has a higher success rate than amalgam treated group .the success rate of MTA treated group was (86.6 %) while the failure rate of MTA treated group was (13.3%), the success rate of zinc free amalgam treated group was ( 66.6%) and the rate of uncertain healing was (13.3%) while the rate of failure was (22%). Conclusions: MTA can be a good alternative to amalgam as a retro grade filling material, but amalgam is inexpensive, available ,and most of the dentist are familiar with the use of it.
Key concepts: Mineral trioxide aggregate, Amalgam (chemistry), Dentistry, Medicine, Significant difference, Zinc, Orthodontics, Chemistry