2020Applied Linguistics Research JournalOpen access

Textual Metafunction and Translation: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective

Elham Rajab Dorri

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Systemic functional linguistics has provided a systematic approach to analyze texts. Different strata of Systemic Functional Grammar have shed light on studies. In this paper, the topic has been restricted to one aspect only, i.e. the textual metafunction, which is realized by the thematic structure. Marked thematic structure is the area of differences between source language and target language, which challenge translation process. The present study is the contrastive study of marked thematic structure in English argumentative texts and their Persian translations. It has been benefitted from Shimid's classification of marked thematic structure. The data are extracted from the first 1000 sentences of two English argumentative texts and their translations into Persian. For each kind of marked thematic structure strategies used by translators were identified. It attempts to see what corresponding processes are actually used in Persian translation. The result of the study showed that construction with adjunct fronting posed more challenge for translators than passive sentences or cleft or pseudo-cleft sentences. The results can be useful for everyone who wishes to get familiar with the process of translation, in transferring not only the semantic contents, but also the thematic purports of the source into the target language.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Systemic functional linguistics has provided a systematic approach to analyze texts. Different strata of Systemic Functional Grammar have shed light on studies. In this paper, the topic has been restricted to one aspect only, i.e. the textual metafunction, which is realized by the thematic structure. Marked thematic structure is the area of differences between source language and target language, which challenge translation process. The present study is the contrastive study of marked thematic structure in English argumentative texts and their Persian translations. It has been benefitted from Shimid's classification of marked thematic structure. The data are extracted from the first 1000 sentences of two English argumentative texts and their translations into Persian. For each kind of marked thematic structure strategies used by translators were identified. It attempts to see what corresponding processes are actually used in Persian translation. The result of the study showed that construction with adjunct fronting posed more challenge for translators than passive sentences or cleft or pseudo-cleft sentences. The results can be useful for everyone who wishes to get familiar with the process of translation, in transferring not only the semantic contents, but also the thematic purports of the source into the target language.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Systemic functional linguistics has provided a systematic approach to analyze texts. Different strata of Systemic Functional Grammar have shed light on studies. In this paper, the topic has been restricted to one aspect only, i.e. the textual metafunction, which is realized by the thematic structure. Marked thematic structure is the area of differences between source language and target language, which challenge translation process. The present study is the contrastive study of marked thematic structure in English argumentative texts and their Persian translations. It has been benefitted from Shimid's classification of marked thematic structure. The data are extracted from the first 1000 sentences of two English argumentative texts and their translations into Persian. For each kind of marked thematic structure strategies used by translators were identified. It attempts to see what corresponding processes are actually used in Persian translation. The result of the study showed that construction with adjunct fronting posed more challenge for translators than passive sentences or cleft or pseudo-cleft sentences. The results can be useful for everyone who wishes to get familiar with the process of translation, in transferring not only the semantic contents, but also the thematic purports of the source into the target language.

Key concepts: Perspective (graphical), Linguistics, Systemic functional linguistics, Translation (biology), Systemic functional grammar, Sociology, Psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Textual Metafunction and Translation: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens