ORAMA Project - D2.3 Draft Good Practice Guidelines for the collection of SRM data, improvement potential, definition and execution of Case Studies
Michelle Wagner, Johan Tivander, Maria Ljunggren Söderman
Abstract
Michelle Wagner, Johan Tivander, Maria Ljunggren Söderman
Abstract
This report is the result of Task 2.3 of the project ORAMA, corresponding to the third and final deliverable of Work Package (WP) 2. It combines previous tasks undertaken in WP2, which includes the first two deliverables, D2.1 and D2.2. In the first deliverable, an initial review and analysis of the current data collection practices for SRM across Europe from Member States reporting practices, previous and ongoing projects were formulated in a form of a structured inventory.In the second deliverable, an assessment and data gap analysis of the different data collection methods was done. In addition, recommendations and prioritization of strategies on how to improve and harmonize information in Member States (MS) were drawn. The recommendations provided in D2.2 were the bases for the formulation and implementation of each waste group’s case study which they will illustrate current deliverable. Furthermore, the case studies will provide the necessary information to create technical guidelines and training materials for WP4.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report is the result of Task 2.3 of the project ORAMA, corresponding to the third and final deliverable of Work Package (WP) 2. It combines previous tasks undertaken in WP2, which includes the first two deliverables, D2.1 and D2.2. In the first deliverable, an initial review and analysis of the current data collection practices for SRM across Europe from Member States reporting practices, previous and ongoing projects were formulated in a form of a structured inventory.In the second deliverable, an assessment and data gap analysis of the different data collection methods was done. In addition, recommendations and prioritization of strategies on how to improve and harmonize information in Member States (MS) were drawn. The recommendations provided in D2.2 were the bases for the formulation and implementation of each waste group’s case study which they will illustrate current deliverable. Furthermore, the case studies will provide the necessary information to create technical guidelines and training materials for WP4.
Key concepts: Deliverable, Task (project management), Data collection, Work (physics), Prioritization, Process management, Computer science, Operations research