2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Flood risk governance

Liz Sharp

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The term ‘governance culture’ is derived from the ‘cultural theory’ developed by the anthropologist Mary Douglas and utilised by M. Thompson and many others as a means of understanding how societies achieve collective action. The aim of looking at governance culture is to explore the values and understandings about human society that underlie the way undertake collective actions. The different governance cultures can help to understand some of the differences between flood management elements associated with flood defence (FD) and flood risk management, at least on a broad level. In York, a long history of flood management has meant that historic FDs have been supplemented by attempts to make space for water in the city, in terms of positioning of flood barriers to allow greater local storage, and in terms of aspirations for upland management far upstream from the city. The chapter introduces cultural theory as a means of analysing approaches to collective action.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The term ‘governance culture’ is derived from the ‘cultural theory’ developed by the anthropologist Mary Douglas and utilised by M. Thompson and many others as a means of understanding how societies achieve collective action. The aim of looking at governance culture is to explore the values and understandings about human society that underlie the way undertake collective actions. The different governance cultures can help to understand some of the differences between flood management elements associated with flood defence (FD) and flood risk management, at least on a broad level. In York, a long history of flood management has meant that historic FDs have been supplemented by attempts to make space for water in the city, in terms of positioning of flood barriers to allow greater local storage, and in terms of aspirations for upland management far upstream from the city. The chapter introduces cultural theory as a means of analysing approaches to collective action.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The term ‘governance culture’ is derived from the ‘cultural theory’ developed by the anthropologist Mary Douglas and utilised by M. Thompson and many others as a means of understanding how societies achieve collective action. The aim of looking at governance culture is to explore the values and understandings about human society that underlie the way undertake collective actions. The different governance cultures can help to understand some of the differences between flood management elements associated with flood defence (FD) and flood risk management, at least on a broad level. In York, a long history of flood management has meant that historic FDs have been supplemented by attempts to make space for water in the city, in terms of positioning of flood barriers to allow greater local storage, and in terms of aspirations for upland management far upstream from the city. The chapter introduces cultural theory as a means of analysing approaches to collective action.

Key concepts: Flood myth, Corporate governance, Business, Risk governance, Environmental planning, Environmental science, Geography, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flood risk governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens