Experimental Evaluation for the Interference-fit Electromagnetic Rveting Joint with Headless Rivet
Danlong Song, Xiangyang Zhang, Kai Liu, Yanchao Zhang, Zhenchao Yang
Abstract
Open-access reader
Danlong Song, Xiangyang Zhang, Kai Liu, Yanchao Zhang, Zhenchao Yang
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology as a relatively new mechanical joining process has many advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. However, it needs to be investigated whether the traditional pressing riveting can be replaced by EMR process in aerospace manufacturing engineering. Therefore, in this paper, the differences of riveting quality between automatic riveting and handheld EMR were compared by riveting and mechanical experiments including the uniformity of interference fit, shear and pull-off strength and fatigue life of the joints respectively. It was observed that the interference fit of the riveting joint using EMR is more uniform along the axial direction of rivet than that of automatic riveting. In addition, the overhang of the rivet was difficult to control by handheld EMR, so the quality of rivets for EMR was poorer than that of automatic riveting. Thus, the shear and pull-off strength and fatigue life of EMR joints were affected by the quality of rivets, and a longer rivet is needed for the EMR.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology as a relatively new mechanical joining process has many advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. However, it needs to be investigated whether the traditional pressing riveting can be replaced by EMR process in aerospace manufacturing engineering. Therefore, in this paper, the differences of riveting quality between automatic riveting and handheld EMR were compared by riveting and mechanical experiments including the uniformity of interference fit, shear and pull-off strength and fatigue life of the joints respectively. It was observed that the interference fit of the riveting joint using EMR is more uniform along the axial direction of rivet than that of automatic riveting. In addition, the overhang of the rivet was difficult to control by handheld EMR, so the quality of rivets for EMR was poorer than that of automatic riveting. Thus, the shear and pull-off strength and fatigue life of EMR joints were affected by the quality of rivets, and a longer rivet is needed for the EMR.
Key concepts: Rivet, Joint (building), Engineering, Process (computing), Mechanical engineering, Structural engineering, Materials science, Computer science