2020•Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production TechnologyOpen access

Estimation of reservoir porosity using analysis of seismic attributes in an Iranian oil field

Fatemeh Soleimani, Erfan Hosseini, Farzad Hajivand

Open full text 25 citations

Abstract

Abstract The most commonly used data for reservoir description are well and seismic data. Well data such as logs typically provide sufficient vertical resolution but leave a large space between the wells. Three-dimensional seismic data, on the other hand, can provide more detailed reservoir characterization between wells. However, the vertical resolution of seismic data is poor compared with that of well data. Conventionally, seismic data have been used to delineate reservoir structure; however, seismic data can be used for reservoir characterization such as porosity. Therefore, we can combine these two types of data to obtain reservoir parameters such as porosity and saturation. It is available the desired parameter (such as porosity) of the number of wells in the reservoir and seismic cube. And we are looking for the parameter estimation in the whole reservoir. To do this, there are several methods including multiple linear regression, neural networks, and geostatistical methods. Therefore, by determining the reservoir properties and correctly estimating these parameters, optimization can be performed with fewer wells, and the costs of exploration and production are reduced. In this paper, we apply these methods on the available data for an oil field in southwest Iran to obtain the porosity in a total reservoir cube, and these methods are then compared with one another. The results clearly show the superiority of neural networks compared with the other methods in estimating the reservoir parameter. The results also show that although estimation accuracy is increased significantly with the use of the geostatistical approach, this method requires that a sufficient number of well logs, representing all the fields under investigation, be provided in order to improve the geological model obtained by the multi-attribute and neural network methods.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The most commonly used data for reservoir description are well and seismic data. Well data such as logs typically provide sufficient vertical resolution but leave a large space between the wells. Three-dimensional seismic data, on the other hand, can provide more detailed reservoir characterization between wells. However, the vertical resolution of seismic data is poor compared with that of well data. Conventionally, seismic data have been used to delineate reservoir structure; however, seismic data can be used for reservoir characterization such as porosity. Therefore, we can combine these two types of data to obtain reservoir parameters such as porosity and saturation. It is available the desired parameter (such as porosity) of the number of wells in the reservoir and seismic cube. And we are looking for the parameter estimation in the whole reservoir. To do this, there are several methods including multiple linear regression, neural networks, and geostatistical methods. Therefore, by determining the reservoir properties and correctly estimating these parameters, optimization can be performed with fewer wells, and the costs of exploration and production are reduced. In this paper, we apply these methods on the available data for an oil field in southwest Iran to obtain the porosity in a total reservoir cube, and these methods are then compared with one another. The results clearly show the superiority of neural networks compared with the other methods in estimating the reservoir parameter. The results also show that although estimation accuracy is increased significantly with the use of the geostatistical approach, this method requires that a sufficient number of well logs, representing all the fields under investigation, be provided in order to improve the geological model obtained by the multi-attribute and neural network methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The most commonly used data for reservoir description are well and seismic data. Well data such as logs typically provide sufficient vertical resolution but leave a large space between the wells. Three-dimensional seismic data, on the other hand, can provide more detailed reservoir characterization between wells. However, the vertical resolution of seismic data is poor compared with that of well data. Conventionally, seismic data have been used to delineate reservoir structure; however, seismic data can be used for reservoir characterization such as porosity. Therefore, we can combine these two types of data to obtain reservoir parameters such as porosity and saturation. It is available the desired parameter (such as porosity) of the number of wells in the reservoir and seismic cube. And we are looking for the parameter estimation in the whole reservoir. To do this, there are several methods including multiple linear regression, neural networks, and geostatistical methods. Therefore, by determining the reservoir properties and correctly estimating these parameters, optimization can be performed with fewer wells, and the costs of exploration and production are reduced. In this paper, we apply these methods on the available data for an oil field in southwest Iran to obtain the porosity in a total reservoir cube, and these methods are then compared with one another. The results clearly show the superiority of neural networks compared with the other methods in estimating the reservoir parameter. The results also show that although estimation accuracy is increased significantly with the use of the geostatistical approach, this method requires that a sufficient number of well logs, representing all the fields under investigation, be provided in order to improve the geological model obtained by the multi-attribute and neural network methods.

Key concepts: Seismic to simulation, Reservoir modeling, Geology, Oil field, Seismic inversion, Porosity, Geostatistics, Petrophysics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Estimation of reservoir porosity using analysis of seismic attributes in an Iranian oil field — Research Paper | ScholarLens