2016•Iris (Roma Tre University)Requires access

Naturalism and Realism in the Philosophy of Science

Matteo Morganti

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses naturalism in the philosophy of science, with a special focus on to the issue of scientific realism. After introducing the theme of naturalism in more general terms, it is first critically assessed whether and how the debate over scientific realism lends itself to a naturalistic approach. An analogous inquiry is then carried out with respect to the relationship between metaphysics and science - a careful analysis of which appears to be particularly important from the point of view of the scientific realist. In both cases, it is suggested that a naturalistic approach is both possible and potentially fruitful, provided that naturalism be given a 'mild' or 'liberal' characterization. In the course of the discussion, an overview of existing positions is offered, and some considerations in favor of a metaphysically engaged scientific realism provided.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses naturalism in the philosophy of science, with a special focus on to the issue of scientific realism. After introducing the theme of naturalism in more general terms, it is first critically assessed whether and how the debate over scientific realism lends itself to a naturalistic approach. An analogous inquiry is then carried out with respect to the relationship between metaphysics and science - a careful analysis of which appears to be particularly important from the point of view of the scientific realist. In both cases, it is suggested that a naturalistic approach is both possible and potentially fruitful, provided that naturalism be given a 'mild' or 'liberal' characterization. In the course of the discussion, an overview of existing positions is offered, and some considerations in favor of a metaphysically engaged scientific realism provided.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses naturalism in the philosophy of science, with a special focus on to the issue of scientific realism. After introducing the theme of naturalism in more general terms, it is first critically assessed whether and how the debate over scientific realism lends itself to a naturalistic approach. An analogous inquiry is then carried out with respect to the relationship between metaphysics and science - a careful analysis of which appears to be particularly important from the point of view of the scientific realist. In both cases, it is suggested that a naturalistic approach is both possible and potentially fruitful, provided that naturalism be given a 'mild' or 'liberal' characterization. In the course of the discussion, an overview of existing positions is offered, and some considerations in favor of a metaphysically engaged scientific realism provided.

Key concepts: Naturalism, Realism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Scientific realism, Critical realism (philosophy of perception), Philosophy of science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Naturalism and Realism in the Philosophy of Science — Research Paper | ScholarLens