2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Research on ancestor worship

Triin Laidoner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Research into ancestor worship has a long history. Interest started to emerge in the first half of the 19th century when folklore was first considered a useful instrument for studying ancient religions and ritual practices. The earliest folklorists combined mythology and folklore, but for following generations folklore became the most authentic source. Alongside Mannhardt’s models of folklore and emphasis on the ‘lower mythology,’ which greatly emphasised links to ancestors, evolutionary anthropology took root. Influenced by Darwinian theories, evolutionary ideas were in opposition to biblical creationism, and native cultures – where ancestor worship was almost always a central element – came to represent the early stages of religious development. With the emergence of functionalist field studies, the focus shifted to contemporary indigenous societies and the study of kinship, which dominated social anthropology throughout the 20th century. In the years following World War II, previous enthusiasm led to a counter-reaction and ‘ancestor worship’ was stringently redefined. This new methodological approach also affected other areas of research that explore religion, such as Old Norse scholarship.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research into ancestor worship has a long history. Interest started to emerge in the first half of the 19th century when folklore was first considered a useful instrument for studying ancient religions and ritual practices. The earliest folklorists combined mythology and folklore, but for following generations folklore became the most authentic source. Alongside Mannhardt’s models of folklore and emphasis on the ‘lower mythology,’ which greatly emphasised links to ancestors, evolutionary anthropology took root. Influenced by Darwinian theories, evolutionary ideas were in opposition to biblical creationism, and native cultures – where ancestor worship was almost always a central element – came to represent the early stages of religious development. With the emergence of functionalist field studies, the focus shifted to contemporary indigenous societies and the study of kinship, which dominated social anthropology throughout the 20th century. In the years following World War II, previous enthusiasm led to a counter-reaction and ‘ancestor worship’ was stringently redefined. This new methodological approach also affected other areas of research that explore religion, such as Old Norse scholarship.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research into ancestor worship has a long history. Interest started to emerge in the first half of the 19th century when folklore was first considered a useful instrument for studying ancient religions and ritual practices. The earliest folklorists combined mythology and folklore, but for following generations folklore became the most authentic source. Alongside Mannhardt’s models of folklore and emphasis on the ‘lower mythology,’ which greatly emphasised links to ancestors, evolutionary anthropology took root. Influenced by Darwinian theories, evolutionary ideas were in opposition to biblical creationism, and native cultures – where ancestor worship was almost always a central element – came to represent the early stages of religious development. With the emergence of functionalist field studies, the focus shifted to contemporary indigenous societies and the study of kinship, which dominated social anthropology throughout the 20th century. In the years following World War II, previous enthusiasm led to a counter-reaction and ‘ancestor worship’ was stringently redefined. This new methodological approach also affected other areas of research that explore religion, such as Old Norse scholarship.

Key concepts: Worship, Ancestor, History, Geography, Philosophy, Archaeology, Theology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research on ancestor worship — Research Paper | ScholarLens