2018•Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)Open access

Application of phosphine fumigant for controlling rice storage insect pests in foundation seeds

Ekkarat Kaewnango, Anchalee Prasertsak

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The development of phosphine resistance in storage insect pests is now problematic, so the increase of rate and frequency of phosphine fumigation in a storage room is needed. However, an adverse effect on seed germination, and human hazard needs to be tested. This experiment was aimed to find the most suitable methods used in combination with phosphine fumigation to reduce the risk of phosphine exposure. The treatments were (1) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and then open a plastic cloth (2) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and continue to cover a plastic cloth (3) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and spray pirimiphos methyl on sack (4) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and use a light trap (5) treat seeds with sweet flag powder before phosphine fumigation for 7 days (6) no phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth opening and (7) no phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth covering. In each treatment, seeds were sampled every month for 12 months to determine seed quality and insect populations. The results showed that seeds treated with sweet flag powder and fumed with phosphine for 7 days can significantly control storage rice insect pests in the first and the second year of experiments. The seed moisture content in each treatment changed in a similar pattern throughout 12 months storage in both years (13.4 – 13.7%). The seed germination showed similar results (more than 80% after 6 months storage), except the treatment of 7 days phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth covering which resulted in a slowly decline in germination. Seed weight losses and numbers of insect pests in the treatment with sweet flag powder were significantly less than the others.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The development of phosphine resistance in storage insect pests is now problematic, so the increase of rate and frequency of phosphine fumigation in a storage room is needed. However, an adverse effect on seed germination, and human hazard needs to be tested. This experiment was aimed to find the most suitable methods used in combination with phosphine fumigation to reduce the risk of phosphine exposure. The treatments were (1) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and then open a plastic cloth (2) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and continue to cover a plastic cloth (3) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and spray pirimiphos methyl on sack (4) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and use a light trap (5) treat seeds with sweet flag powder before phosphine fumigation for 7 days (6) no phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth opening and (7) no phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth covering. In each treatment, seeds were sampled every month for 12 months to determine seed quality and insect populations. The results showed that seeds treated with sweet flag powder and fumed with phosphine for 7 days can significantly control storage rice insect pests in the first and the second year of experiments. The seed moisture content in each treatment changed in a similar pattern throughout 12 months storage in both years (13.4 – 13.7%). The seed germination showed similar results (more than 80% after 6 months storage), except the treatment of 7 days phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth covering which resulted in a slowly decline in germination. Seed weight losses and numbers of insect pests in the treatment with sweet flag powder were significantly less than the others.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The development of phosphine resistance in storage insect pests is now problematic, so the increase of rate and frequency of phosphine fumigation in a storage room is needed. However, an adverse effect on seed germination, and human hazard needs to be tested. This experiment was aimed to find the most suitable methods used in combination with phosphine fumigation to reduce the risk of phosphine exposure. The treatments were (1) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and then open a plastic cloth (2) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and continue to cover a plastic cloth (3) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and spray pirimiphos methyl on sack (4) phosphine fumigation for 7 days and use a light trap (5) treat seeds with sweet flag powder before phosphine fumigation for 7 days (6) no phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth opening and (7) no phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth covering. In each treatment, seeds were sampled every month for 12 months to determine seed quality and insect populations. The results showed that seeds treated with sweet flag powder and fumed with phosphine for 7 days can significantly control storage rice insect pests in the first and the second year of experiments. The seed moisture content in each treatment changed in a similar pattern throughout 12 months storage in both years (13.4 – 13.7%). The seed germination showed similar results (more than 80% after 6 months storage), except the treatment of 7 days phosphine fumigation with plastic cloth covering which resulted in a slowly decline in germination. Seed weight losses and numbers of insect pests in the treatment with sweet flag powder were significantly less than the others.

Key concepts: Fumigation, Phosphine, Germination, Horticulture, Biology, Agronomy, Toxicology, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of phosphine fumigant for controlling rice storage insect pests in foundation seeds — Research Paper | ScholarLens