2020PubMedOpen access

Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia Techniques for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Raha Khaneshi, Sousan Rasooli, Farnaz Moslemi, Sanam Fakour

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To diminish labor pain, several techniques have been used in developed countries. In the current randomized controlled trial, the use of epidural analgesia via PCEA pump with and without background infusion of analgesic was studied. METHODS: after drug injection. The chi-square and student T-test were used for comparing variables between groups, and 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of demographic variables. Mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly lower in patients received continuous infusion (CI) (p<0.0001). However, the total administered fentanyl dose was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCEA (p<0.0001). Besides, the CI group had a significantly lower rate of patient-controlled injection compared to PCEA patients (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between patients' satisfaction and VAS in study groups. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia using PCEA combined with continuous infusion did not provide higher analgesia or patients' satisfaction compared to PCEA alone; however, it led to a decreased rate of drug injection and total administered dosage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: To diminish labor pain, several techniques have been used in developed countries. In the current randomized controlled trial, the use of epidural analgesia via PCEA pump with and without background infusion of analgesic was studied. METHODS: after drug injection. The chi-square and student T-test were used for comparing variables between groups, and 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of demographic variables. Mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly lower in patients received continuous infusion (CI) (p<0.0001). However, the total administered fentanyl dose was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCEA (p<0.0001). Besides, the CI group had a significantly lower rate of patient-controlled injection compared to PCEA patients (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between patients' satisfaction and VAS in study groups. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia using PCEA combined with continuous infusion did not provide higher analgesia or patients' satisfaction compared to PCEA alone; however, it led to a decreased rate of drug injection and total administered dosage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: To diminish labor pain, several techniques have been used in developed countries. In the current randomized controlled trial, the use of epidural analgesia via PCEA pump with and without background infusion of analgesic was studied. METHODS: after drug injection. The chi-square and student T-test were used for comparing variables between groups, and 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of demographic variables. Mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly lower in patients received continuous infusion (CI) (p<0.0001). However, the total administered fentanyl dose was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCEA (p<0.0001). Besides, the CI group had a significantly lower rate of patient-controlled injection compared to PCEA patients (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between patients' satisfaction and VAS in study groups. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia using PCEA combined with continuous infusion did not provide higher analgesia or patients' satisfaction compared to PCEA alone; however, it led to a decreased rate of drug injection and total administered dosage.

Key concepts: Medicine, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Visual analogue scale, Randomized controlled trial, Analgesic, Patient satisfaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia Techniques for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). — Research Paper | ScholarLens