2020Journal of Graph TheoryOpen access

On clique‐inverse graphs of graphs with bounded clique number

Liliana Alcón, Sylvain Gravier, Cláudia Linhares Sales, Fábio Protti, Gabriela Ravenna

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The clique graph K(G) of G is the intersection graph of the family of maximal cliques of G. For a family of graphs, the family of clique‐inverse graphs of , denoted by , is defined as . Let be the family of Kp‐free graphs, that is, graphs with clique number at most p − 1, for an integer constant p ≥ 2. Deciding whether a graph H is a clique‐inverse graph of can be done in polynomial time; in addition, for can be characterized by a finite family of forbidden induced subgraphs. In Protti and Szwarcfiter, the authors propose to extend such characterizations to higher values of p. Then a natural question arises: Is there a characterization of by means of a finite family of forbidden induced subgraphs, for any p ≥ 2? In this note we give a positive answer to this question. We present upper bounds for the order, the clique number, and the stability number of every forbidden induced subgraph for in terms of p.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The clique graph K(G) of G is the intersection graph of the family of maximal cliques of G. For a family of graphs, the family of clique‐inverse graphs of , denoted by , is defined as . Let be the family of Kp‐free graphs, that is, graphs with clique number at most p − 1, for an integer constant p ≥ 2. Deciding whether a graph H is a clique‐inverse graph of can be done in polynomial time; in addition, for can be characterized by a finite family of forbidden induced subgraphs. In Protti and Szwarcfiter, the authors propose to extend such characterizations to higher values of p. Then a natural question arises: Is there a characterization of by means of a finite family of forbidden induced subgraphs, for any p ≥ 2? In this note we give a positive answer to this question. We present upper bounds for the order, the clique number, and the stability number of every forbidden induced subgraph for in terms of p.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The clique graph K(G) of G is the intersection graph of the family of maximal cliques of G. For a family of graphs, the family of clique‐inverse graphs of , denoted by , is defined as . Let be the family of Kp‐free graphs, that is, graphs with clique number at most p − 1, for an integer constant p ≥ 2. Deciding whether a graph H is a clique‐inverse graph of can be done in polynomial time; in addition, for can be characterized by a finite family of forbidden induced subgraphs. In Protti and Szwarcfiter, the authors propose to extend such characterizations to higher values of p. Then a natural question arises: Is there a characterization of by means of a finite family of forbidden induced subgraphs, for any p ≥ 2? In this note we give a positive answer to this question. We present upper bounds for the order, the clique number, and the stability number of every forbidden induced subgraph for in terms of p.

Key concepts: Combinatorics, Mathematics, Split graph, Chordal graph, Clique graph, Discrete mathematics, Clique-sum, Block graph

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On clique‐inverse graphs of graphs with bounded clique number — Research Paper | ScholarLens