FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND FEMINIST VALUE THEORY
Elizabeth Potter
Abstract
Elizabeth Potter
Abstract
How sharp is the dichotomy between facts and values? Clearly theyfunction in different ways in our thinking and in our lives, but how differently? Logical empiricists made a very sharp distinction based on the conviction that factual claims can be corrected by experience and values cannot. The sciences offer the most rigorous, methodical ways to verify and correct factual claims and accounts of our world, but since values cannot be falsified or verified, they lie outside the sciences. They must, therefore, be held “dogmatically” as expressions of opinion or emotion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
How sharp is the dichotomy between facts and values? Clearly theyfunction in different ways in our thinking and in our lives, but how differently? Logical empiricists made a very sharp distinction based on the conviction that factual claims can be corrected by experience and values cannot. The sciences offer the most rigorous, methodical ways to verify and correct factual claims and accounts of our world, but since values cannot be falsified or verified, they lie outside the sciences. They must, therefore, be held “dogmatically” as expressions of opinion or emotion.
Key concepts: Feminist philosophy, Feminist theory, Value (mathematics), Sociology, Epistemology, Gender studies, Feminism, Philosophy