2006Unpublished venueRequires access

FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND FEMINIST VALUE THEORY

Elizabeth Potter

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

How sharp is the dichotomy between facts and values? Clearly theyfunction in different ways in our thinking and in our lives, but how differently? Logical empiricists made a very sharp distinction based on the conviction that factual claims can be corrected by experience and values cannot. The sciences offer the most rigorous, methodical ways to verify and correct factual claims and accounts of our world, but since values cannot be falsified or verified, they lie outside the sciences. They must, therefore, be held “dogmatically” as expressions of opinion or emotion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

How sharp is the dichotomy between facts and values? Clearly theyfunction in different ways in our thinking and in our lives, but how differently? Logical empiricists made a very sharp distinction based on the conviction that factual claims can be corrected by experience and values cannot. The sciences offer the most rigorous, methodical ways to verify and correct factual claims and accounts of our world, but since values cannot be falsified or verified, they lie outside the sciences. They must, therefore, be held “dogmatically” as expressions of opinion or emotion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

How sharp is the dichotomy between facts and values? Clearly theyfunction in different ways in our thinking and in our lives, but how differently? Logical empiricists made a very sharp distinction based on the conviction that factual claims can be corrected by experience and values cannot. The sciences offer the most rigorous, methodical ways to verify and correct factual claims and accounts of our world, but since values cannot be falsified or verified, they lie outside the sciences. They must, therefore, be held “dogmatically” as expressions of opinion or emotion.

Key concepts: Feminist philosophy, Feminist theory, Value (mathematics), Sociology, Epistemology, Gender studies, Feminism, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND FEMINIST VALUE THEORY — Research Paper | ScholarLens