2020•SVU-International Journal of Agricultural SciencesOpen access

Evaluation of some pesticides against the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) under laboratory conditions

R. Ahmed R. Ahmed, K.M. Mohanny, Ghada Salah, R.O.H Allam

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

The tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) is considered a devastating pest, particularly to the tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. The present study was carried out to determine the efficacy of five pesticides namely, indoxacarb, (abamectin+ thiamethoxam), emamectin benzoate, fipronil and imidacloprid against the 3rd larval instar of T. absoluta under laboratory conditions using the Leaf-dip method. The tested pesticides could be descendingly arranged as follows: emamectin benzoate, fipronil, (abamectin + thiamethoxam), indoxacarb and imidacloprid. The corresponding LC50 values after 72 h. were 0.07, 0.22, 0.28, 0.59 and 2.67 ppm, while LC90 values were 0.56, 3.25, 1.99, 4.69 and 30.29 ppm, respectively. It is clear that emamectin benzoate was the most toxic compound, whereas imidacloprid was the least toxic one. Results indicated that emamectin benzoate can be used as a good element in integrated management program to this pest.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) is considered a devastating pest, particularly to the tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. The present study was carried out to determine the efficacy of five pesticides namely, indoxacarb, (abamectin+ thiamethoxam), emamectin benzoate, fipronil and imidacloprid against the 3rd larval instar of T. absoluta under laboratory conditions using the Leaf-dip method. The tested pesticides could be descendingly arranged as follows: emamectin benzoate, fipronil, (abamectin + thiamethoxam), indoxacarb and imidacloprid. The corresponding LC50 values after 72 h. were 0.07, 0.22, 0.28, 0.59 and 2.67 ppm, while LC90 values were 0.56, 3.25, 1.99, 4.69 and 30.29 ppm, respectively. It is clear that emamectin benzoate was the most toxic compound, whereas imidacloprid was the least toxic one. Results indicated that emamectin benzoate can be used as a good element in integrated management program to this pest.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) is considered a devastating pest, particularly to the tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. The present study was carried out to determine the efficacy of five pesticides namely, indoxacarb, (abamectin+ thiamethoxam), emamectin benzoate, fipronil and imidacloprid against the 3rd larval instar of T. absoluta under laboratory conditions using the Leaf-dip method. The tested pesticides could be descendingly arranged as follows: emamectin benzoate, fipronil, (abamectin + thiamethoxam), indoxacarb and imidacloprid. The corresponding LC50 values after 72 h. were 0.07, 0.22, 0.28, 0.59 and 2.67 ppm, while LC90 values were 0.56, 3.25, 1.99, 4.69 and 30.29 ppm, respectively. It is clear that emamectin benzoate was the most toxic compound, whereas imidacloprid was the least toxic one. Results indicated that emamectin benzoate can be used as a good element in integrated management program to this pest.

Key concepts: Indoxacarb, Tuta absoluta, Thiamethoxam, Imidacloprid, Fipronil, Gelechiidae, Emamectin, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of some pesticides against the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) under laboratory conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens