2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

For a New Accessibility

Carmen Papalia

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

In this growing landscape of non-option institutional support services, those with diverse and complex needs are routinely disempowered by the systems that they rely upon in order to maintain their basic health and well-being. This deeply rooted oppression plays out in schools, hospitals, cultural institutions, policing organizations, and through various arms of government, making one’s effort to claim agency a strategic, high-stakes intervention. However, if access was defined by an open, collective process, would the systems that those in need rely upon be accessible as needs change and as institutional entities evolve? What might the tenets of an open model for access be? This chapter explores how I have negotiated these considerations in life and in my socially engaged art practice, outlining the strategies that I have employed in order to find a community of support in the midst of a complex set of disabling social and cultural conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this growing landscape of non-option institutional support services, those with diverse and complex needs are routinely disempowered by the systems that they rely upon in order to maintain their basic health and well-being. This deeply rooted oppression plays out in schools, hospitals, cultural institutions, policing organizations, and through various arms of government, making one’s effort to claim agency a strategic, high-stakes intervention. However, if access was defined by an open, collective process, would the systems that those in need rely upon be accessible as needs change and as institutional entities evolve? What might the tenets of an open model for access be? This chapter explores how I have negotiated these considerations in life and in my socially engaged art practice, outlining the strategies that I have employed in order to find a community of support in the midst of a complex set of disabling social and cultural conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this growing landscape of non-option institutional support services, those with diverse and complex needs are routinely disempowered by the systems that they rely upon in order to maintain their basic health and well-being. This deeply rooted oppression plays out in schools, hospitals, cultural institutions, policing organizations, and through various arms of government, making one’s effort to claim agency a strategic, high-stakes intervention. However, if access was defined by an open, collective process, would the systems that those in need rely upon be accessible as needs change and as institutional entities evolve? What might the tenets of an open model for access be? This chapter explores how I have negotiated these considerations in life and in my socially engaged art practice, outlining the strategies that I have employed in order to find a community of support in the midst of a complex set of disabling social and cultural conditions.

Key concepts: Computer science, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
For a New Accessibility — Research Paper | ScholarLens