1996Unpublished venueRequires access

The Evaluation of Public Policy: Normative Economic Theories of Government Failure

Brian Dollery, Andrew C. Worthington

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Conventional economic analysis of public policy has been traditionally conducted in the conceptual context of the theory of market failure. The resultant analytical framework enabled analysts to assess the economic efficiency of market outcomes, and prescribe appropriate government intervention where necessary. No corresponding theoretical structure existed to facilitate an equivalent investigation into the economic efficiency of nonmarket outcomes. However, quite distinct from public choice theory, a normative theory of government failure has emerged to form a conceptual analogue to the market failure paradigm. At present this embryonic theory of government failure has three strands: Wolf’s theory of nonmarket failure, Le Grand’s theory of government failure, and Vining and Weimer’s theory of government production failure. The present paper evaluates the extent to which this seminal literature can assist in the design of rational public policy processes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conventional economic analysis of public policy has been traditionally conducted in the conceptual context of the theory of market failure. The resultant analytical framework enabled analysts to assess the economic efficiency of market outcomes, and prescribe appropriate government intervention where necessary. No corresponding theoretical structure existed to facilitate an equivalent investigation into the economic efficiency of nonmarket outcomes. However, quite distinct from public choice theory, a normative theory of government failure has emerged to form a conceptual analogue to the market failure paradigm. At present this embryonic theory of government failure has three strands: Wolf’s theory of nonmarket failure, Le Grand’s theory of government failure, and Vining and Weimer’s theory of government production failure. The present paper evaluates the extent to which this seminal literature can assist in the design of rational public policy processes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conventional economic analysis of public policy has been traditionally conducted in the conceptual context of the theory of market failure. The resultant analytical framework enabled analysts to assess the economic efficiency of market outcomes, and prescribe appropriate government intervention where necessary. No corresponding theoretical structure existed to facilitate an equivalent investigation into the economic efficiency of nonmarket outcomes. However, quite distinct from public choice theory, a normative theory of government failure has emerged to form a conceptual analogue to the market failure paradigm. At present this embryonic theory of government failure has three strands: Wolf’s theory of nonmarket failure, Le Grand’s theory of government failure, and Vining and Weimer’s theory of government production failure. The present paper evaluates the extent to which this seminal literature can assist in the design of rational public policy processes.

Key concepts: Nonmarket forces, Market failure, Government failure, Normative, Economic interventionism, Economics, Government (linguistics), Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Evaluation of Public Policy: Normative Economic Theories of Government Failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens