2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Network society: Manuel Castells

Frank Webster

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The subject of this chapter is at once thrillingly bold and disturbingly vague. It is bold in that the prefix ‘post’ evokes the idea of a decisive break with the past and the arrival of a new age. This notion is both appealing and interesting, not least because announcements of postmodernity accord with the views of others who argue we are entering a novel Information Society. However, the subject is also disconcertingly woolly, postmodernity being hard to define with precision. The term can appear to be a series of impressionistic suggestions (with repeated pronouncements on ‘difference’, ‘discourses’, ‘irony’ and the like) and gnomic reflections of the zeitgeist . Furthermore, postmodernity seems at once to be everywhere (in architecture, in academic disciplines, in attitudes to the self) and, because the words are so imprecisely used, impossible to pin down.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The subject of this chapter is at once thrillingly bold and disturbingly vague. It is bold in that the prefix ‘post’ evokes the idea of a decisive break with the past and the arrival of a new age. This notion is both appealing and interesting, not least because announcements of postmodernity accord with the views of others who argue we are entering a novel Information Society. However, the subject is also disconcertingly woolly, postmodernity being hard to define with precision. The term can appear to be a series of impressionistic suggestions (with repeated pronouncements on ‘difference’, ‘discourses’, ‘irony’ and the like) and gnomic reflections of the zeitgeist . Furthermore, postmodernity seems at once to be everywhere (in architecture, in academic disciplines, in attitudes to the self) and, because the words are so imprecisely used, impossible to pin down.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The subject of this chapter is at once thrillingly bold and disturbingly vague. It is bold in that the prefix ‘post’ evokes the idea of a decisive break with the past and the arrival of a new age. This notion is both appealing and interesting, not least because announcements of postmodernity accord with the views of others who argue we are entering a novel Information Society. However, the subject is also disconcertingly woolly, postmodernity being hard to define with precision. The term can appear to be a series of impressionistic suggestions (with repeated pronouncements on ‘difference’, ‘discourses’, ‘irony’ and the like) and gnomic reflections of the zeitgeist . Furthermore, postmodernity seems at once to be everywhere (in architecture, in academic disciplines, in attitudes to the self) and, because the words are so imprecisely used, impossible to pin down.

Key concepts: Network society, Political science, Sociology, Social science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Network society: Manuel Castells — Research Paper | ScholarLens