Network society: Manuel Castells
Frank Webster
Abstract
Frank Webster
Abstract
The subject of this chapter is at once thrillingly bold and disturbingly vague. It is bold in that the prefix ‘post’ evokes the idea of a decisive break with the past and the arrival of a new age. This notion is both appealing and interesting, not least because announcements of postmodernity accord with the views of others who argue we are entering a novel Information Society. However, the subject is also disconcertingly woolly, postmodernity being hard to define with precision. The term can appear to be a series of impressionistic suggestions (with repeated pronouncements on ‘difference’, ‘discourses’, ‘irony’ and the like) and gnomic reflections of the zeitgeist . Furthermore, postmodernity seems at once to be everywhere (in architecture, in academic disciplines, in attitudes to the self) and, because the words are so imprecisely used, impossible to pin down.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The subject of this chapter is at once thrillingly bold and disturbingly vague. It is bold in that the prefix ‘post’ evokes the idea of a decisive break with the past and the arrival of a new age. This notion is both appealing and interesting, not least because announcements of postmodernity accord with the views of others who argue we are entering a novel Information Society. However, the subject is also disconcertingly woolly, postmodernity being hard to define with precision. The term can appear to be a series of impressionistic suggestions (with repeated pronouncements on ‘difference’, ‘discourses’, ‘irony’ and the like) and gnomic reflections of the zeitgeist . Furthermore, postmodernity seems at once to be everywhere (in architecture, in academic disciplines, in attitudes to the self) and, because the words are so imprecisely used, impossible to pin down.
Key concepts: Network society, Political science, Sociology, Social science