Innovation in China: a Systematic Literature Review
Kolja Oswald, Xiaokang Zhao
Abstract
Kolja Oswald, Xiaokang Zhao
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to assess China’s national system of innovation by analyzing it as a whole. To assess innovation in China, a systematic literature review was conducted. It was found that the Chinese innovation system is unique in its mixed top-down approach, and deserves to be viewed from a Chinese view. China’s innovation system is also heavily divided by regions, as some have high innovation levels and others remain low. It is also found that there is little research on academia and individuals and innovation, and collaboration is becoming a popular organizational research area within innovation research. Practical implications - this paper shows that a top-down innovation approach can be successful. Secondly, policy makers should attempt to create stronger bonds between universities and the industry and government. Thirdly, policy makers should consider the importance of the individual in the process of innovation. Originality/value – This is the first literature review on innovation in China at this range. This literature review assesses the current snapshot of China’s innovation system and offers readers the opportunity to not only get an understanding for China’s innovation system but also identify research gaps.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of this paper is to assess China’s national system of innovation by analyzing it as a whole. To assess innovation in China, a systematic literature review was conducted. It was found that the Chinese innovation system is unique in its mixed top-down approach, and deserves to be viewed from a Chinese view. China’s innovation system is also heavily divided by regions, as some have high innovation levels and others remain low. It is also found that there is little research on academia and individuals and innovation, and collaboration is becoming a popular organizational research area within innovation research. Practical implications - this paper shows that a top-down innovation approach can be successful. Secondly, policy makers should attempt to create stronger bonds between universities and the industry and government. Thirdly, policy makers should consider the importance of the individual in the process of innovation. Originality/value – This is the first literature review on innovation in China at this range. This literature review assesses the current snapshot of China’s innovation system and offers readers the opportunity to not only get an understanding for China’s innovation system but also identify research gaps.
Key concepts: China, Originality, Innovation system, Innovation management, Innovation process, Government (linguistics), National innovation system, Business