2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Efficient Constraint Handling based on the Adaptive Penalty Method with Balancing the Objective Function Value and the Constraint Violation

Takeshi Kawachi, Jun-ichi Kushida, Akira Hara, Tetsuyuki Takahama

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Real world problems are often formularized as constrained optimization problems (COPs). Constraint handling techniques are important for efficient search, and various approaches such as penalty methods or feasibility rules have been studied. The penalty methods deal with a single fitness function by combining the objective function value and the constraint violation with a penalty factor. Moreover, the penalty factor can be flexibly adapted by feeding back information on search process in adaptive penalty methods. However, keeping the good balance between the objective function value and the constraint violation is very difficult. In this paper, we propose a new adaptive penalty method with balancing the objective function value and the constraint violation and examine its effectiveness. L-SHADE is adopted as a base algorithm to evaluate search performance, and the optimization results of 28 benchmark functions provided by the CEC 2017 competition on constrained single-objective numerical optimizations are compared with other methods. In addition, we also examine the behavioral difference between proposed method and the conventional adaptive penalty method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Real world problems are often formularized as constrained optimization problems (COPs). Constraint handling techniques are important for efficient search, and various approaches such as penalty methods or feasibility rules have been studied. The penalty methods deal with a single fitness function by combining the objective function value and the constraint violation with a penalty factor. Moreover, the penalty factor can be flexibly adapted by feeding back information on search process in adaptive penalty methods. However, keeping the good balance between the objective function value and the constraint violation is very difficult. In this paper, we propose a new adaptive penalty method with balancing the objective function value and the constraint violation and examine its effectiveness. L-SHADE is adopted as a base algorithm to evaluate search performance, and the optimization results of 28 benchmark functions provided by the CEC 2017 competition on constrained single-objective numerical optimizations are compared with other methods. In addition, we also examine the behavioral difference between proposed method and the conventional adaptive penalty method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Real world problems are often formularized as constrained optimization problems (COPs). Constraint handling techniques are important for efficient search, and various approaches such as penalty methods or feasibility rules have been studied. The penalty methods deal with a single fitness function by combining the objective function value and the constraint violation with a penalty factor. Moreover, the penalty factor can be flexibly adapted by feeding back information on search process in adaptive penalty methods. However, keeping the good balance between the objective function value and the constraint violation is very difficult. In this paper, we propose a new adaptive penalty method with balancing the objective function value and the constraint violation and examine its effectiveness. L-SHADE is adopted as a base algorithm to evaluate search performance, and the optimization results of 28 benchmark functions provided by the CEC 2017 competition on constrained single-objective numerical optimizations are compared with other methods. In addition, we also examine the behavioral difference between proposed method and the conventional adaptive penalty method.

Key concepts: Penalty method, Mathematical optimization, Constraint (computer-aided design), Benchmark (surveying), Computer science, Constrained optimization, Function (biology), Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficient Constraint Handling based on the Adaptive Penalty Method with Balancing the Objective Function Value and the Constraint Violation — Research Paper | ScholarLens