2020Journal of Asian Architecture and Building EngineeringOpen access

A methodology for evaluating seismic capacity and seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Korea

Ju‐Seong Jung, Kang Seok Lee

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose a method for evaluating the seismic capacity of existing RC buildings in Korea by reviewing the applicability of the Japanese Standard. Based on the seismic capacity of Korean buildings evaluated by this standard, we modified the basic structural index, which is calculated in terms of the ultimate horizontal strength and ductility. We compared our experiment results to the values calculated using the strength equations for columns and walls from the Japanese Standard. The flexural strength equations could be applied without modification, while the shear strength equations required modification. We evaluated these modified strength equations and proposed unit average shear stresses of columns and walls based on statistical data relating to the structural characteristics of Korean buildings. The values of the ductility indices, which are primarily calculated based on the shear-to-flexural capacity ratio, of Korean buildings with hoop spacing wider than 300 mm, as computed by the proposed method, were more reasonable than those calculated by the Japanese Standard. We believe that the proposed method provides a useful strategy for identifying Korean buildings that are vulnerable to seismic activity, and recommend urgent earthquake preparedness measures.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to propose a method for evaluating the seismic capacity of existing RC buildings in Korea by reviewing the applicability of the Japanese Standard. Based on the seismic capacity of Korean buildings evaluated by this standard, we modified the basic structural index, which is calculated in terms of the ultimate horizontal strength and ductility. We compared our experiment results to the values calculated using the strength equations for columns and walls from the Japanese Standard. The flexural strength equations could be applied without modification, while the shear strength equations required modification. We evaluated these modified strength equations and proposed unit average shear stresses of columns and walls based on statistical data relating to the structural characteristics of Korean buildings. The values of the ductility indices, which are primarily calculated based on the shear-to-flexural capacity ratio, of Korean buildings with hoop spacing wider than 300 mm, as computed by the proposed method, were more reasonable than those calculated by the Japanese Standard. We believe that the proposed method provides a useful strategy for identifying Korean buildings that are vulnerable to seismic activity, and recommend urgent earthquake preparedness measures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose a method for evaluating the seismic capacity of existing RC buildings in Korea by reviewing the applicability of the Japanese Standard. Based on the seismic capacity of Korean buildings evaluated by this standard, we modified the basic structural index, which is calculated in terms of the ultimate horizontal strength and ductility. We compared our experiment results to the values calculated using the strength equations for columns and walls from the Japanese Standard. The flexural strength equations could be applied without modification, while the shear strength equations required modification. We evaluated these modified strength equations and proposed unit average shear stresses of columns and walls based on statistical data relating to the structural characteristics of Korean buildings. The values of the ductility indices, which are primarily calculated based on the shear-to-flexural capacity ratio, of Korean buildings with hoop spacing wider than 300 mm, as computed by the proposed method, were more reasonable than those calculated by the Japanese Standard. We believe that the proposed method provides a useful strategy for identifying Korean buildings that are vulnerable to seismic activity, and recommend urgent earthquake preparedness measures.

Key concepts: Structural engineering, Flexural strength, Ductility (Earth science), Reinforced concrete, Seismic analysis, Seismic risk, Shear strength (soil), Shear wall

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A methodology for evaluating seismic capacity and seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Korea — Research Paper | ScholarLens