2020•Journal of Guidance Control and DynamicsOpen access

General Perturbation Method for Satellite Constellation Deployment Using Nodal Precession

Ciara McGrath, Malcolm Macdonald

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

The dawn of "New Space" in recent years is changing the landscape of the space industry. In particular, the shift to smaller satellites, requiring shorter development time s and using off-the-shelf-components and standardized buses, has led to a continuing reduction in spacecraft cost. However, launch costs remain extremely high and frequently dominate the total mission cost. Additionally, many small satellites are designed to operate as part of a larger constellation, but traditional launch methods require a difference dedicated launch for each orbit plane to be populated. This need for multiple costly launches can stifle, and even prohibit, some missions requiring numerous orbit planes as the launch cost increases beyond what can be justified for the mission. As of 2014, most smallsats, including CubeSats, have been launched on opportunistic ‘rideshare’ or ‘piggy-back’ launches, in which the spacecraft shares its launch with other craft, often as a secondary payload. This has the advantage of providing a cheaper launch but restricts the operator’s choice of orbit, which will affect the system performance.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The dawn of "New Space" in recent years is changing the landscape of the space industry. In particular, the shift to smaller satellites, requiring shorter development time s and using off-the-shelf-components and standardized buses, has led to a continuing reduction in spacecraft cost. However, launch costs remain extremely high and frequently dominate the total mission cost. Additionally, many small satellites are designed to operate as part of a larger constellation, but traditional launch methods require a difference dedicated launch for each orbit plane to be populated. This need for multiple costly launches can stifle, and even prohibit, some missions requiring numerous orbit planes as the launch cost increases beyond what can be justified for the mission. As of 2014, most smallsats, including CubeSats, have been launched on opportunistic ‘rideshare’ or ‘piggy-back’ launches, in which the spacecraft shares its launch with other craft, often as a secondary payload. This has the advantage of providing a cheaper launch but restricts the operator’s choice of orbit, which will affect the system performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The dawn of "New Space" in recent years is changing the landscape of the space industry. In particular, the shift to smaller satellites, requiring shorter development time s and using off-the-shelf-components and standardized buses, has led to a continuing reduction in spacecraft cost. However, launch costs remain extremely high and frequently dominate the total mission cost. Additionally, many small satellites are designed to operate as part of a larger constellation, but traditional launch methods require a difference dedicated launch for each orbit plane to be populated. This need for multiple costly launches can stifle, and even prohibit, some missions requiring numerous orbit planes as the launch cost increases beyond what can be justified for the mission. As of 2014, most smallsats, including CubeSats, have been launched on opportunistic ‘rideshare’ or ‘piggy-back’ launches, in which the spacecraft shares its launch with other craft, often as a secondary payload. This has the advantage of providing a cheaper launch but restricts the operator’s choice of orbit, which will affect the system performance.

Key concepts: Aerospace, Software deployment, Constellation, Satellite, Aeronautics, Operations research, Library science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
General Perturbation Method for Satellite Constellation Deployment Using Nodal Precession — Research Paper | ScholarLens