2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Organization-Production Theory

Susan Gross Solomon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the three stages of development of Organization-Production theory, tracing the ideas that culminated in the 1925 explanation of family farm dynamics. It provides particular attention to the degree of intellectual consensus among the Timiriazev professors and to their relations with various reference groups. The theory for which the Organization-Production group became known developed in three stages, which spanned a period of nearly fifteen years. Between 1912 and 1915 the theory unfolded as the Timiriazev professors articulated a set of concepts and a series of relationships that they knit together into a preliminary account of the family farm economy. A. V. Chaianov analysis of the dynamics of the family farm had interesting implications for classical economic theory. Chaianov next inquired about the effect on the rural economy of the participation of a large sector of family farms. The criticism was launched first by L. N. Kritsman and G. Meerson.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the three stages of development of Organization-Production theory, tracing the ideas that culminated in the 1925 explanation of family farm dynamics. It provides particular attention to the degree of intellectual consensus among the Timiriazev professors and to their relations with various reference groups. The theory for which the Organization-Production group became known developed in three stages, which spanned a period of nearly fifteen years. Between 1912 and 1915 the theory unfolded as the Timiriazev professors articulated a set of concepts and a series of relationships that they knit together into a preliminary account of the family farm economy. A. V. Chaianov analysis of the dynamics of the family farm had interesting implications for classical economic theory. Chaianov next inquired about the effect on the rural economy of the participation of a large sector of family farms. The criticism was launched first by L. N. Kritsman and G. Meerson.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the three stages of development of Organization-Production theory, tracing the ideas that culminated in the 1925 explanation of family farm dynamics. It provides particular attention to the degree of intellectual consensus among the Timiriazev professors and to their relations with various reference groups. The theory for which the Organization-Production group became known developed in three stages, which spanned a period of nearly fifteen years. Between 1912 and 1915 the theory unfolded as the Timiriazev professors articulated a set of concepts and a series of relationships that they knit together into a preliminary account of the family farm economy. A. V. Chaianov analysis of the dynamics of the family farm had interesting implications for classical economic theory. Chaianov next inquired about the effect on the rural economy of the participation of a large sector of family farms. The criticism was launched first by L. N. Kritsman and G. Meerson.

Key concepts: Production (economics), Production theory, Business, Economics, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organization-Production Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens