2020International Petroleum Technology ConferenceRequires access

SOfPD Subsea Pipelines Technical Assessment

Abdullah Mohammed Alanazi, Omar Al-Daej

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The assessment approach for the study utilized a semi-quantitative risk-based methodology designed to identify, analyze and evaluate risk associated with each subsea pipeline. The risk calculation combines the Probability of Failure (PoF) and the Consequence of Failure (CoF). The PoF calculations considered different factors, which believed to have direct impact on the likelihood of pipelines failure including: internal corrosion, hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) susceptibility and mechanical integrity. In general, the risks levels are High, Medium-High, Medium and Low. The High and Medium-High risks level is mainly driven by the high CoF due to significant economic and environment impacts and high PoF due to internal corrosion, HIC cracking susceptibility and mechanical integrity. In order to lower the risks both PoF and CoF should be reduced.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The assessment approach for the study utilized a semi-quantitative risk-based methodology designed to identify, analyze and evaluate risk associated with each subsea pipeline. The risk calculation combines the Probability of Failure (PoF) and the Consequence of Failure (CoF). The PoF calculations considered different factors, which believed to have direct impact on the likelihood of pipelines failure including: internal corrosion, hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) susceptibility and mechanical integrity. In general, the risks levels are High, Medium-High, Medium and Low. The High and Medium-High risks level is mainly driven by the high CoF due to significant economic and environment impacts and high PoF due to internal corrosion, HIC cracking susceptibility and mechanical integrity. In order to lower the risks both PoF and CoF should be reduced.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The assessment approach for the study utilized a semi-quantitative risk-based methodology designed to identify, analyze and evaluate risk associated with each subsea pipeline. The risk calculation combines the Probability of Failure (PoF) and the Consequence of Failure (CoF). The PoF calculations considered different factors, which believed to have direct impact on the likelihood of pipelines failure including: internal corrosion, hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) susceptibility and mechanical integrity. In general, the risks levels are High, Medium-High, Medium and Low. The High and Medium-High risks level is mainly driven by the high CoF due to significant economic and environment impacts and high PoF due to internal corrosion, HIC cracking susceptibility and mechanical integrity. In order to lower the risks both PoF and CoF should be reduced.

Key concepts: Subsea, Pipeline transport, Integrity management, Cracking, Pipeline (software), Corrosion, Risk assessment, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SOfPD Subsea Pipelines Technical Assessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens