2018PubMedRequires access

Letter to Editor - Is the AIM curriculum, for higher specialty training, fit for purpose? - response.

Nicola Cooper

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

I read the article, 'Is the AIM curriculum, for higher specialty training, fit for purpose' with interest. However, I disagree with the author on a number of points. First, a curriculum is 'everything that happens in relation to an educational programme', not a document setting out intentions and expectations. Issues with the quality of training in medical specialties are often addressed by re-writing documents. But the root causes of problems are often to do with the quality of posts 'on the ground' (e.g. timetable, experience and learning opportunities) and the quality of supervision and feedback (nonexistent in some cases).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I read the article, 'Is the AIM curriculum, for higher specialty training, fit for purpose' with interest. However, I disagree with the author on a number of points. First, a curriculum is 'everything that happens in relation to an educational programme', not a document setting out intentions and expectations. Issues with the quality of training in medical specialties are often addressed by re-writing documents. But the root causes of problems are often to do with the quality of posts 'on the ground' (e.g. timetable, experience and learning opportunities) and the quality of supervision and feedback (nonexistent in some cases).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I read the article, 'Is the AIM curriculum, for higher specialty training, fit for purpose' with interest. However, I disagree with the author on a number of points. First, a curriculum is 'everything that happens in relation to an educational programme', not a document setting out intentions and expectations. Issues with the quality of training in medical specialties are often addressed by re-writing documents. But the root causes of problems are often to do with the quality of posts 'on the ground' (e.g. timetable, experience and learning opportunities) and the quality of supervision and feedback (nonexistent in some cases).

Key concepts: Specialty, Curriculum, Quality (philosophy), Medical education, Medicine, Training (meteorology), Relation (database), Root (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Letter to Editor - Is the AIM curriculum, for higher specialty training, fit for purpose? - response. — Research Paper | ScholarLens