1956•Chemical & Engineering NewsRequires access

Evaluating Training Programs

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 1,107 citations

Abstract

IT COSTS MORE out-of-pocket money not to train salesmen than it does to pay for a good training job, says William F. Wrightnour of United States Rubber Co. The only time training money is misspent is when training is done merely for training's sake with ineffective results, Wrightnour told the American Management Association's annual marketing conference. It is important, he says, to appraise training programs to make sure they are accomphshing their purposes. Based on a study he recently made of the sales training approaches of a number of American companies, Wrightnour asserts that the most reliable way to measure the results of training versus no training is to establish two groups of salesmen, matched so that they are as nearly alike as possible. Then administer training to only one group and note the resulting differences. One company tried a variation: devising four types of training programs and administering them ...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

IT COSTS MORE out-of-pocket money not to train salesmen than it does to pay for a good training job, says William F. Wrightnour of United States Rubber Co. The only time training money is misspent is when training is done merely for training's sake with ineffective results, Wrightnour told the American Management Association's annual marketing conference. It is important, he says, to appraise training programs to make sure they are accomphshing their purposes. Based on a study he recently made of the sales training approaches of a number of American companies, Wrightnour asserts that the most reliable way to measure the results of training versus no training is to establish two groups of salesmen, matched so that they are as nearly alike as possible. Then administer training to only one group and note the resulting differences. One company tried a variation: devising four types of training programs and administering them ...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1107 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

IT COSTS MORE out-of-pocket money not to train salesmen than it does to pay for a good training job, says William F. Wrightnour of United States Rubber Co. The only time training money is misspent is when training is done merely for training's sake with ineffective results, Wrightnour told the American Management Association's annual marketing conference. It is important, he says, to appraise training programs to make sure they are accomphshing their purposes. Based on a study he recently made of the sales training approaches of a number of American companies, Wrightnour asserts that the most reliable way to measure the results of training versus no training is to establish two groups of salesmen, matched so that they are as nearly alike as possible. Then administer training to only one group and note the resulting differences. One company tried a variation: devising four types of training programs and administering them ...

Key concepts: Citation, Icon, Computer science, Altmetrics, Social media, Information retrieval, Library science, World Wide Web

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating Training Programs — Research Paper | ScholarLens