2020•Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyRequires access

Co‐doping effects of (Al, Ti, Mg) on the microstructure and electrical behavior of ZnO‐based ceramics

Qianying Sun, Guorong Li, Tian Tian, Jiangtao Zeng, Kunyu Zhao, Liaoying Zheng, Maud Barré, Jens Dittmer, Francois Gouttenoire, A. Rousseau, Abdel Hadi Kassiba

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Co‐doped ZnO‐based ceramics using Al, Ti, and Mg ions in different ratios were synthesized with the objective to investigate the doping effects on the crystalline features, microstructure and the electrical behavior. For Al and Ti doping, a coexistence of crystalline phases was shown with a major wurtzite ZnO structure and secondary spinel phases (ZnAl 2 O 4 , Zn 2 TiO 4 , or Zn a Ti b Al c O d ), while Mg doping did not alter significantly the structural features of the wurtzite ZnO phase. The electrical behavior induced by Al, Ti, and Mg co‐doping in different ratios was investigated using Raman, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and 27 Al and 67 Zn solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Al doping induces a high electrical conductivity compared to other doping elements. In particular, shallow donors from Zn i ‐Al Zn defect structures are inferred from the characteristic NMR signal at about 185 ppm; that is, quite far from the usual oxygen coordinated Al. The Knight shift effect emanating from a highly conducting Al‐doped ZnO ceramics was considered as the origin of this observation. Oppositely, as Ti doping leads to the formation of secondary spinel phases, EPR analysis shows a high concentration of Ti 3+ ions which limit the electrical conductivity. The correlation between the structural features at the local order, the involved defects and the electrical behavior as function of the doping process are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Co‐doped ZnO‐based ceramics using Al, Ti, and Mg ions in different ratios were synthesized with the objective to investigate the doping effects on the crystalline features, microstructure and the electrical behavior. For Al and Ti doping, a coexistence of crystalline phases was shown with a major wurtzite ZnO structure and secondary spinel phases (ZnAl 2 O 4 , Zn 2 TiO 4 , or Zn a Ti b Al c O d ), while Mg doping did not alter significantly the structural features of the wurtzite ZnO phase. The electrical behavior induced by Al, Ti, and Mg co‐doping in different ratios was investigated using Raman, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and 27 Al and 67 Zn solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Al doping induces a high electrical conductivity compared to other doping elements. In particular, shallow donors from Zn i ‐Al Zn defect structures are inferred from the characteristic NMR signal at about 185 ppm; that is, quite far from the usual oxygen coordinated Al. The Knight shift effect emanating from a highly conducting Al‐doped ZnO ceramics was considered as the origin of this observation. Oppositely, as Ti doping leads to the formation of secondary spinel phases, EPR analysis shows a high concentration of Ti 3+ ions which limit the electrical conductivity. The correlation between the structural features at the local order, the involved defects and the electrical behavior as function of the doping process are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Co‐doped ZnO‐based ceramics using Al, Ti, and Mg ions in different ratios were synthesized with the objective to investigate the doping effects on the crystalline features, microstructure and the electrical behavior. For Al and Ti doping, a coexistence of crystalline phases was shown with a major wurtzite ZnO structure and secondary spinel phases (ZnAl 2 O 4 , Zn 2 TiO 4 , or Zn a Ti b Al c O d ), while Mg doping did not alter significantly the structural features of the wurtzite ZnO phase. The electrical behavior induced by Al, Ti, and Mg co‐doping in different ratios was investigated using Raman, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and 27 Al and 67 Zn solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Al doping induces a high electrical conductivity compared to other doping elements. In particular, shallow donors from Zn i ‐Al Zn defect structures are inferred from the characteristic NMR signal at about 185 ppm; that is, quite far from the usual oxygen coordinated Al. The Knight shift effect emanating from a highly conducting Al‐doped ZnO ceramics was considered as the origin of this observation. Oppositely, as Ti doping leads to the formation of secondary spinel phases, EPR analysis shows a high concentration of Ti 3+ ions which limit the electrical conductivity. The correlation between the structural features at the local order, the involved defects and the electrical behavior as function of the doping process are discussed.

Key concepts: Materials science, Doping, Wurtzite crystal structure, Electron paramagnetic resonance, Spinel, Microstructure, Electrical resistivity and conductivity, Raman spectroscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Co‐doping effects of (Al, Ti, Mg) on the microstructure and electrical behavior of ZnO‐based ceramics — Research Paper | ScholarLens