2007Unpublished venueRequires access

The prevention of COPD exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide

Jadwiga Anna Wedzicha, Peter M.A. Calverley, Terence Seemungal, Gerry W. Hagan, Zainab Abeer Ansari, Robert Andrew Stockley

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Rationale: Exacerbations are key drivers of morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: We compared the relative efficacy of the long-acting inhaled bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory combination (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate) 50/500mcg bd and the long-acting bronchodilator (tiotropium) 18mcg od in preventing exacerbations and related outcomes in moderate-severe COPD Methods: 1323 patients (mean age 64yr, forced expiratory volume in 1sec 39% predicted) were randomized in 2-year, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel study. Measurements and Main Results: Primary endpoint was healthcare utilization exacerbation rate. Other endpoints included health status measured by St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), mortality, adverse events and study withdrawal. Probability of withdrawing from the study was 29% greater with tiotropium than salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (p=0.005). The modelled annual exacerbation rate was 1.28 in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group and 1.32 in the tiotropium group (rate ratio 0.967 [95% CI: 0.836 to 1.119]; p=0.656). The SGRQ total score was statistically significantly lower at 2 years on salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus tiotropium (difference 2.1 units, 95% CI: 0.1 to 4.0, p=0.038). Mortality was significantly lower in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group; 21 (3%) of patients in this group died compared to 38 (6%) in the tiotropium group (p=0.032). More pneumonias were reported in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group relative to tiotropium (p=0.008). Conclusions: We found no difference in exacerbation rate between salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and tiotropium. More patients failed to complete the study receiving tiotropium. A small statistically significant beneficial effect was found on health status, with an unexpected finding of lower deaths in salmeterol/fluticasone propionate treated patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rationale: Exacerbations are key drivers of morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: We compared the relative efficacy of the long-acting inhaled bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory combination (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate) 50/500mcg bd and the long-acting bronchodilator (tiotropium) 18mcg od in preventing exacerbations and related outcomes in moderate-severe COPD Methods: 1323 patients (mean age 64yr, forced expiratory volume in 1sec 39% predicted) were randomized in 2-year, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel study. Measurements and Main Results: Primary endpoint was healthcare utilization exacerbation rate. Other endpoints included health status measured by St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), mortality, adverse events and study withdrawal. Probability of withdrawing from the study was 29% greater with tiotropium than salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (p=0.005). The modelled annual exacerbation rate was 1.28 in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group and 1.32 in the tiotropium group (rate ratio 0.967 [95% CI: 0.836 to 1.119]; p=0.656). The SGRQ total score was statistically significantly lower at 2 years on salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus tiotropium (difference 2.1 units, 95% CI: 0.1 to 4.0, p=0.038). Mortality was significantly lower in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group; 21 (3%) of patients in this group died compared to 38 (6%) in the tiotropium group (p=0.032). More pneumonias were reported in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group relative to tiotropium (p=0.008). Conclusions: We found no difference in exacerbation rate between salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and tiotropium. More patients failed to complete the study receiving tiotropium. A small statistically significant beneficial effect was found on health status, with an unexpected finding of lower deaths in salmeterol/fluticasone propionate treated patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rationale: Exacerbations are key drivers of morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: We compared the relative efficacy of the long-acting inhaled bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory combination (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate) 50/500mcg bd and the long-acting bronchodilator (tiotropium) 18mcg od in preventing exacerbations and related outcomes in moderate-severe COPD Methods: 1323 patients (mean age 64yr, forced expiratory volume in 1sec 39% predicted) were randomized in 2-year, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel study. Measurements and Main Results: Primary endpoint was healthcare utilization exacerbation rate. Other endpoints included health status measured by St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), mortality, adverse events and study withdrawal. Probability of withdrawing from the study was 29% greater with tiotropium than salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (p=0.005). The modelled annual exacerbation rate was 1.28 in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group and 1.32 in the tiotropium group (rate ratio 0.967 [95% CI: 0.836 to 1.119]; p=0.656). The SGRQ total score was statistically significantly lower at 2 years on salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus tiotropium (difference 2.1 units, 95% CI: 0.1 to 4.0, p=0.038). Mortality was significantly lower in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group; 21 (3%) of patients in this group died compared to 38 (6%) in the tiotropium group (p=0.032). More pneumonias were reported in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group relative to tiotropium (p=0.008). Conclusions: We found no difference in exacerbation rate between salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and tiotropium. More patients failed to complete the study receiving tiotropium. A small statistically significant beneficial effect was found on health status, with an unexpected finding of lower deaths in salmeterol/fluticasone propionate treated patients.

Key concepts: Fluticasone propionate, Salmeterol, Medicine, Fluticasone, COPD, Tiotropium bromide, Exacerbation, Bronchodilator

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The prevention of COPD exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide — Research Paper | ScholarLens