2016Scholars' Press eBooksRequires access

Reviving Native American Identities

Paul-René Tamburro

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the 1960’s there has been an increase in assertions of Indigenous identity. In the Ohio Valley Region (Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky) this has been expressed through performance at powwows, re-enactments and restored ceremonies. In the USA, American Indian identification is founded on government recognition, racial appearance, or language. Since the region’s languages have disappeared, the “racial” appearance of the people is ambiguous, and government recognition is mainly absent, how has this identity been maintained over time? Analysis of interviews and the other data demonstrated that the identity claim is not only a newly emergent construction. Indigenous identity has been maintained performatively in some quarters while remaining submerged in others. It continues to be constructed and performed drawing from combinations of folk and Appalachian culture and “Pan-Indian” powwows. Similarities were found with other mixed peoples, such as the Metis of Canada. This counters widely held conceptions that there are no “real Indians” in the region, calls into question why such claims are made, and provides a basis for understandings of how claims to identity are negotiated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the 1960’s there has been an increase in assertions of Indigenous identity. In the Ohio Valley Region (Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky) this has been expressed through performance at powwows, re-enactments and restored ceremonies. In the USA, American Indian identification is founded on government recognition, racial appearance, or language. Since the region’s languages have disappeared, the “racial” appearance of the people is ambiguous, and government recognition is mainly absent, how has this identity been maintained over time? Analysis of interviews and the other data demonstrated that the identity claim is not only a newly emergent construction. Indigenous identity has been maintained performatively in some quarters while remaining submerged in others. It continues to be constructed and performed drawing from combinations of folk and Appalachian culture and “Pan-Indian” powwows. Similarities were found with other mixed peoples, such as the Metis of Canada. This counters widely held conceptions that there are no “real Indians” in the region, calls into question why such claims are made, and provides a basis for understandings of how claims to identity are negotiated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the 1960’s there has been an increase in assertions of Indigenous identity. In the Ohio Valley Region (Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky) this has been expressed through performance at powwows, re-enactments and restored ceremonies. In the USA, American Indian identification is founded on government recognition, racial appearance, or language. Since the region’s languages have disappeared, the “racial” appearance of the people is ambiguous, and government recognition is mainly absent, how has this identity been maintained over time? Analysis of interviews and the other data demonstrated that the identity claim is not only a newly emergent construction. Indigenous identity has been maintained performatively in some quarters while remaining submerged in others. It continues to be constructed and performed drawing from combinations of folk and Appalachian culture and “Pan-Indian” powwows. Similarities were found with other mixed peoples, such as the Metis of Canada. This counters widely held conceptions that there are no “real Indians” in the region, calls into question why such claims are made, and provides a basis for understandings of how claims to identity are negotiated.

Key concepts: Metis, Indigenous, Identity (music), Government (linguistics), Native american, Genealogy, Identification (biology), Indigenous culture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reviving Native American Identities — Research Paper | ScholarLens